Dominance Tests and Individual Differences
Abstract
Young baboons appear to be generally less fearful of human Os than rhesus monkeys of the same age. Individual conspecific animals may also show considerable variation in their responses to man. Food- and water-competition tests designed to determine social rank may, therefore, be influenced by such individual differences. Since individual animals may not compete for provisions due to differential fear responses, an assumption of low rank may be incorrect.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Young baboons were found to be more fearful of humans than young Rhesus macaques.
“Young baboons were found to be more fearful of humans than young Rhesus macaques [119].”
From The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [119]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare
Sherwen, S. L., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9060366 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
“Young baboons were found to be more fearful of humans than young Rhesus macaques [119].”
BackgroundA preliminary model of human-animal relationships in the zoo
Hosey, G. (2008) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2007.04.013 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
- Authors
- Maple, T.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Maple, Terry
- ORCID
- Maple, Terry
- Venue
- Perceptual and Motor Skills
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1974-10
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-30
- ISSN
- 0031-5125 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-688X
- OpenAlex
- W2315527003
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 3.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Perceptual and Motor Skills (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Keywords
- dominance hierarchy, social rank, individual differences, fear of humans, baboons, rhesus monkeys, food competition, water competition, cross-species comparison, primate social behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
