Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 5

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effect of Ingestion of Smokeless Tobacco on Motor Distal Latency of the Median Nerve

Lester, Mike J., Jacobson, Bert H., Edwards, Steven W.·1988·Perceptual and Motor Skills

Abstract

Subjects were 17 men between the ages of 18 and 32 yr. and regular users of smokeless tobacco. Each subject received three treatments consisting of one pouch of Skoal Bandits, one pinch of their regular brand, and a nonnicotine piece of chewing gum. The nervous transmission at the neuromuscular junction in the right thumb was compared before treatment and once every minute for 15 min. after treatment. Repeated-measures analysis of variance indicated a significant increase in the distal latencies for both the brand-name grouping and in the regularly used brand. No such difference was found in a control group when compared to the pretest results. It was concluded that smokeless tobacco ingestion resulted in a delay in the nervous transmission across the neuromuscular junction. This delay was hypothesized to be caused by the enduring binding action of nicotine to the acetylcholine receptor sites, thereby blocking the impulse in some of the faster conducting nerve fibers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2466/pms.1988.67.1.283

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Ashton H., 1982, Smoking psychology and pharmacology
  2. Ashton H., 1981, Smoking and arterial disease, 240
  3. 10.14219/jada.archive.1980.0310 · DOI
  4. Christen A. G., 1979, Texas Dentistry, 97, 6
  5. 10.1016/0014-2999(68)90110-6 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/cpt196910172 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/00913847.1987.11702037 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/0306-4603(77)90018-1 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/00913847.1986.11716465 · DOI
  10. Glover E. D., 1984, Health Values: Achieving High Level Wellness, 8, 21
  11. 10.1038/clpt.1981.149 · DOI
  12. Horrobin D. R., 1968, Medical physiology and biochemistry
  13. Kruk Z. L., 1979, Neurotransmitters and drugs
  14. Leavitt F., 1982, Drugs and behavior
  15. Marty P., 1985, Abstracts of research papers, 151
  16. Redmond A., 1979, Electrophysiological effects of nicotine
  17. Russell M. A. H., 1976, Research advances in alcohol and drug problems, 3, 1
  18. 10.1016/S0140-6736(80)91010-7 · DOI
  19. Shriber W. J., 1975, A manual of electromyography

Metadata

Authors
Lester, M. J., Jacobson, B. H., & Edwards, S. W.
Venue
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Published
1988-08
Volume
67
Issue
1
Pages
283-290
ISSN
  • 0031-5125
  • 1558-688X
Cited by
5
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Ingestion of Smokeless Tobacco on Motor Distal Latency of the Median Nerve. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2466/pms.1988.67.1.283
The paper
Lester, M. J., Jacobson, B. H., & Edwards, S. W. (1988). Effect of Ingestion of Smokeless Tobacco on Motor Distal Latency of the Median Nerve. Perceptual and Motor Skills. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1988.67.1.283

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.