The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Case for Technical Analysis
Abstract
IT IS HARDLY NECESSARY to comment in this publication on the growth of the analytical profession during the post-war years. The increase in the number of analysts, and the tremendous improvement in analytical techniques, are familiar phenomena to the readers of this journal. With a growing number of professionals seeking to find new ways of improving investment performance, it is, therefore, hardly surprising that, in the past few years, an ever-increasing number of analysts have turned their attention to technical analysis. It was barely a decade ago that the average portfolio manager, if he was aware of technical analysis at all, regarded it as some sort of black magic. Today, almost all professionals have at least a familiarity with the terminology and a good many make such analysis a major part of their decision-making process. Two factors lead to the conclusion that major improvements in the art are just over the horizon. The first factor is the growing number of serious students applying their time and efforts to analysis of stock prices. The second is the advent of the electronic computer or, more properly, the economic availability of price data in a form that can be analyzed by the computer.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Penggunaan indikator teknikal secara bersamaan dapat membantu investor dalam pengambilan keputusan perdagangan saham (Tabell, 1964)”
From Analisis Tambahan Informasi Indikator Commodity Channel Index pada Indikator Moving Average Convergence Divergence terhadap Return (Studi pada Sektor Pertambangan BEI) (2020) · cites this paper as Tabell, 1964
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lo, A. W., Mamaysky, H., & Wang, J. (2000) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00265 · Cited by 1,131
Lo, A. W., Mamaysky, H., & Wang, J. (2000) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w7613 · Cited by 262
Lo, A. W., & Wang, J. (2010) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53548-1.50007-6 · Cited by 57
Technical market indicators: An overview
Fang, J., Qin, Y., & Jacobsen, B. (2014) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2014.09.001 · Cited by 45
Lo, A. W., Mamaysky, H., & Wang, J. (2002) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-075065516-3.50004-2 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Tabell, E. W., & Tabell, A. W.
- Venue
- Financial Analysts Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1964-03
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 67-76
- ISSN
- 0015-198X (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3312
- OpenAlex
- W2033735196
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Financial Analysts Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Stock Market Forecasting Methods
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance
- Keywords
- technical analysis, stock price analysis, investment performance, portfolio management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review