The DOI matches its Crossref record.
True outcomes for patients on antiretroviral therapy who are lost to follow-up in Malawi
Open accessAbstract
PROBLEM: In many resource-poor countries that are scaling up antiretroviral therapy (ART), 5-25% of patients are reported as "lost to follow-up". This figure is 9% in Malawi. There is no published information about the true outcome status of these patients. APPROACH: In four facilities in northern Malawi, ART registers and master cards were used to identify patients who had not attended the facility for 3 months or more and were thus registered as "lost to follow-up". Clinic staff attempted to trace these patients and ascertain their true outcome status. LOCAL SETTING: Of 253 patients identified as "lost to follow-up", 127 (50%) were dead, 58% of these having died within 3 months of their last clinic visit. Of the 58 patients (23%) found to be alive, 21 were still receiving ART and 37 had stopped treatment (high transport costs being the main reason for 13 patients). Sixty-eight patients (27%) could not be traced, most commonly because of an incorrect address in the register. Fewer patients were alive and more patients could not be traced from the central hospital compared with the peripheral hospitals. RELEVANT CHANGES: Better documentation of patients addresses and prompt follow-up of patients who are late for their appointments are required. LESSONS LEARNED: ART clinics in resource-poor countries should ensure that patients addresses are correct and comprehensive. Clinics should also undertake contact tracing as soon as possible in the event of non-attendance, consider facilitating access to ART clinics and take loss to follow-up into consideration when assessing death rates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Geng, E. H., Bangsberg, D. R., Musinguzi, N., Emenyonu, N., Bwana, M. B., Yiannoutsos, C. T., Glidden, D. V., Deeks, S. G., & Martin, J. N. (2010) · JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes · doi:10.1097/qai.0b013e3181b843f0 · Cited by 300
Mobile health for early retention in HIV care: a qualitative study in Kenya (WelTel Retain)
Smillie, K., Borek, N. V., Kop, M. L. V. D., Lukhwaro, A., Li, N., Karanja, S., Patel, A. R., Ojakaa, D., & Lester, R. T. (2014) · African Journal of AIDS Research · doi:10.2989/16085906.2014.961939 · Cited by 62
HIV treatment and care in resource‐constrained environments: challenges for the next decade
Eholié, S., Aoussi, F. E., Ouattara, I. S., Bissagnéné, E., & Anglaret, X. (2012) · Journal of the International AIDS Society · doi:10.7448/ias.15.2.17334 · Cited by 42
Sande, O., Burtscher, D., Kathumba, D., Tweya, H., Phiri, S., & Gugsa, S. (2020) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-020-08721-6 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Kwong-Leung Yu, J.
- Venue
- Bulletin of the World Health Organization
- Publisher
- WHO Press
- Published
- 2007-07-01
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 550-554
- ISSN
- 0042-9686 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160992219
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: True outcomes for patients on antiretroviral therapy who are lost to follow-up in Malawi. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2471/blt.06.037739
- The paper
- Kwong-Leung Yu, J. (2007). True outcomes for patients on antiretroviral therapy who are lost to follow-up in Malawi. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.06.037739
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.