The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004
Open accessAbstract
Estimates of the prevalence of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004 have been determined at regional and global levels for people aged 5 years and over from recent published and unpublished surveys. The estimates were based on the prevalence of visual acuity of less than 6/18 in the better eye with the currently available refractive correction that could be improved to equal to or better than 6/18 by refraction or pinhole. A total of 153 million people (range of uncertainty: 123 million to 184 million) are estimated to be visually impaired from uncorrected refractive errors, of whom eight million are blind. This cause of visual impairment has been overlooked in previous estimates that were based on best-corrected vision. Combined with the 161 million people visually impaired estimated in 2002 according to best-corrected vision, 314 million people are visually impaired from all causes: uncorrected refractive errors become the main cause of low vision and the second cause of blindness. Uncorrected refractive errors can hamper performance at school, reduce employability and productivity, and generally impair quality of life. Yet the correction of refractive errors with appropriate spectacles is among the most cost-effective interventions in eye health care. The results presented in this paper help to unearth a formerly hidden problem of public health dimensions and promote policy development and implementation, programmatic decision-making and corrective interventions, as well as stimulate research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1996) · Cited by 6,884
Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002.
(2004) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 4,157
World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2019) · doi:10.18356/b9e995fe-en · Cited by 2,667
Pascolini, D., Mariotti, S. P., Pokharel, G. P., Pararajasegaram, R., Etya’ale, D., Négrel, A.-D., & Resnikoff, S. (2004) · Ophthalmic Epidemiology · doi:10.1076/opep.11.2.67.28158 · Cited by 527
Self-citationPrevalence of Visual Impairment in the United States
Vitale, S., Cotch, M. F., & Sperduto, R. D. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.18.2158 · Cited by 376
Refractive error study in children: sampling and measurement methods for a multi-country survey
Negrel, A. D., Maul, E., Pokharel, G. P., Zhao, J., & Ellwein, L. B. (2000) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00455-9 · Cited by 365
A global initiative for the elimination of avoidable blindness
Thylefors, B. (1998) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(99)80239-6 · Cited by 330
Baltimore Vision Screening Project
Preslan, M. W., & Novak, A. (1996) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30753-7 · Cited by 253
CATARACT SURGICAL COVERAGE: An indicator to measure the impact of cataract intervention programmes.
Limburg, H., & Foster, A. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 241
Accuracy of Noncycloplegic Autorefraction in School-Age Children in China
Zhao, J., Mao, J., Luo, R., Li, F., Pokharel, G. P., & Ellwein, L. B. (2004) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1002/j.1538-9235.2004.tb02851.x · Cited by 163
Cited by
Morgan, I. G., Ohno-Matsui, K., & Saw, S.-M. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60272-4 · Cited by 1,871
The Lancet Global Health Commission on Global Eye Health: vision beyond 2020
Burton, M. J., Ramke, J., Marques, A. P., Bourne, R. R. A., Congdon, N., Jones, I., Ah Tong, B. A. M., Arunga, S., Bachani, D., Bascaran, C., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(20)30488-5 · Cited by 1,624
Self-citation(2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acref/9780195306613.001.0001 · Cited by 502
Time outdoors and the prevention of myopia
French, A. N., Ashby, R. S., Morgan, I. G., & Rose, K. A. (2013) · Experimental Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.exer.2013.04.018 · Cited by 395
Potential lost productivity resulting from the global burden of uncorrected refractive error
Smith, T. (2009) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.08.055673 · Cited by 347
Metadata
- Authors
- Resnikoff, S.
- Venue
- Bulletin of the World Health Organization
- Publisher
- WHO Press
- Published
- 2008-01-01
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 63-70
- ISSN
- 0042-9686 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148039314
- Cited by
- 1,151
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 34.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2471/blt.07.041210
- The paper
- Resnikoff, S. (2008). Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.07.041210
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.