Violence against women: an urgent public health priority
Open accessAbstract
Violence against women has been described as “perhaps the most shameful human rights violation, and the most pervasive.”1 Addressing violence against women is central to the achievement of Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 3 on women's empowerment and gender equality, as well as MDGs 4, 5 and 6.2 It is also a peace and security issue. In spite of this recognition, investment in prevention and in services for survivors remains woefully inadequate. Research on violence against women – especially male partner violence – has increased. Since 2005, when the first results of the World Health Organization (WHO) Multi-Country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence3 were launched, the number of intimate partner violence prevalence studies increased fourfold, from 80 to more than 300, in 2008. We now have population-based prevalence data on intimate partner violence from more than 90 countries, although there are still some regions – such as the Middle East and west Africa – where there is relatively limited data. Similarly, there is also a growing body of evidence about the range of negative health and development consequences of this violence. Women suffer violent deaths either directly – through homicide – or indirectly, through suicide, maternal causes and AIDS. Violence is also an important cause of morbidity from multiple mental, physical, sexual and reproductive health outcomes, and it is also linked with known risk factors for poor health, such as alcohol and drug use, s…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
IPV has been widely recognized as a public health epidemic, given the strong evidence that violence against women has a negative impact on women's physical and mental health and well-being.
“IPV has been widely recognized as a public health epidemic, given the strong evidence that violence against women has a negative impact on women's physical and mental health and well-being (Chrisler & Ferguson, 2006; Garcia-Moreno & Watts, 2011).”
From A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON THE IMPACT OF EXPOSURE TO INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH (2014) · cites this paper as Garcia-Moreno & Watts, 2011
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 8 · Cited by 329
- Authors
- Garcia-Moreno, C., & Watts, C.
- Affiliations
- aDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, 20 avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland.
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
- ORCID
- Watts, Charlotte
- Venue
- Bulletin of the World Health Organization
- Publisher
- WHO Press
- Published
- 2011-01-01
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2-2
- ISSN
- 0042-9686 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3040024
- OpenAlex
- W2159931273
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Bulletin of the World Health Organization (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Violence, Rights in Latin America
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
- Keywords
- violence against women, intimate partner violence, domestic violence, health burden, disability-adjusted life years, economic costs of violence, violence prevention, women's empowerment, gender equality, Millennium Development Goals, health policy, public health priorities, resource-limited settings
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Public Health, Socioeconomic Factors, Violence, Global Health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review