The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative performance of national civil registration and vital statistics systems: a global assessment
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To assess the current state of the world's civil registration and vital statistics systems based on publicly available data and to propose strategic development pathways, including priority interventions, for countries at different levels of civil registration and vital statistics performance. Methods: We applied a performance assessment framework to publicly available data, using a composite indicator highly correlated with civil registration and vital statistics performance which we then adjusted for data incomparability and missing values. Findings: Globally, civil registration and vital statistics systems score on average 0.70 (0-1 scale), with substantial variations across countries and regions. Scores ranged from less than 0.50 in emerging systems to nearly 1.00 in the most developed systems. Approximately one fifth of the world's population live in the 43 countries with low system performance (< 0.477). Irrespective of system development, health sector indicators consistently scored lower than other determinants of civil registration and vital statistics performance. Conclusion: From our assessment, we provide three main recommendations for how the health sector can contribute to improving civil registration and vital statistics systems: (i) enhanced health sector engagement in birth and death notification; (ii) a more systematic approach to training cause of death diagnostics; and (iii) leadership in the implementation of verbal autopsy methods. Four different civil registration and vital statistics improvement pathways for countries at different levels of system development are proposed, that can constitute a blueprint for regional civil registration and vital statistics strengthening activities that countries can adapt and refine to suit their capabilities, resources, and particular challenges.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many countries, including in sub-Saharan Africa, still lack high-quality demographic and cause-of-death data, and this hinders any serious attempt to set national priorities using local data.
“We do note, however, that many countries–including in sub-Saharan Africa–still lack high-quality demographic and cause-of-death data,138 and this hinders any serious attempt to set national priorities using local data.”
From Global health 2050: the path to halving premature death by mid-century (2024) · cites this paper as [138]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Naghavi, M., Richards, N., Chowdhury, H., Eynstone-Hinkins, J., Franca, E., Hegnauer, M., Khosravi, A., Moran, L., Mikkelsen, L., & Lopez, A. D. (2020) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-020-01525-w · Cited by 74
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Global health 2050: the path to halving premature death by mid-century
Jamison, D. T., Summers, L. H., Chang, A. Y., Karlsson, O., Mao, W., Norheim, O. F., Ogbuoji, O., Schäferhoff, M., Watkins, D., Adeyi, O., et al. (2024) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(24)01439-9 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Mikkelsen, L., Hooper, J., Adair, T., Badr, A., & Lopez, A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- World Health Organization (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Adair, Tim
- Venue
- Bulletin of the World Health Organization
- Publisher
- WHO Press
- Published
- 2023-12-01
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 758-767
- ISSN
- 0042-9686 (ISSN-L)
- 1564-0604
- PMC
- PMC10680112
- OpenAlex
- W4389180714
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 8.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Bulletin of the World Health Organization (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- World Health Organization
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
- Keywords
- civil registration and vital statistics, vital registration systems, performance evaluation, composite index, cause of death certification, verbal autopsy, systems strengthening, global health data
- MeSH terms
- Autopsy, Data Collection, Humans, Registries, Vital Statistics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review