Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 360

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Precambrian crustal growth of Yangtze Craton as revealed by detrital zircon studies

Open access
Liu, X., Gao, S., Diwu, C., Ling, W.·2008·American Journal of Science

Abstract

Clastic sedimentary rocks are natural samples of the exposed continental crust over large areas. The age and evolution of the Yangtze craton is not well known, because much of the craton is covered by thick Nanhua (850 --635Ma), Sinian (635 --543Ma) and Phanerozoic sedimentary rocks. The Nanhua clastic sedimentary rocks including tillites provide ideal samples for studies of age and evolution of the craton. 1130 zircons in 8 sandstone and tillite samples of three Nanhua formations (Liantuo, Gucheng and Nantuo) from the Yangtze Gorges area were dated by LA-ICP-MS. 251 of the 711 concordant zircons were analyzed for Hf isotopic compositions by LA-MC-ICP-MS. The results reveal four major age groups of 720 to 910 Ma, 1.90 to 2.05 Ga, 2.40 to 2.55Ga and 2.60 to 2.70 Ga with few grains \>3.2Ga. Although Hf isotopic compositions show both juvenile crustal growth and reworking of old crust for all the age groups, the Paleoproterozoic is a period of prominent crustal reworking with negative ε~Hf~(t) values. The Neoproterozoic is a period of significant juvenile crustal additions, accounting for 68 percent of zircons with positive ε~Hf~(t) values similar to those of the depleted mantle. Crustal additions at 3.2 to 3.8Ga are also significant, as indicated by the zircon Hf continental model ages. Our results highlight the importance of analysis of a sufficient number of zircons for provenance studies. In addition, our results illustrate that possible temporal and spatial provenance variations have to be taken into account for better characterizing formation and evolution of the related continental crust. Our obtained youngest age for each formation shows a strong negative correlation with stratigraphic height. Youngest ages provide good constraints on the maximum ages of the three Nanhua formations: ≤770Ma, ≤733Ma and ≤704Ma for the base, middle unit and top of the Liantuo Formation, respectively; ≤703Ma for the Gucheng Formation and possibly ≤600 to 606Ma for the Nantuo Formation. Although the North China and Yangtze cratons show some apparently similar zircon ages, the two cratons have distinct histories of formation and evolution. While the North China craton is dominated by Archean crustal growth, the Yangtze craton is characterized by prominent crustal additions in the Neoproterozoic, which is almost lacking in the North China craton.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2475/04.2008.02

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 360

Metadata

Authors
Liu, X., Gao, S., Diwu, C., & Ling, W.
Venue
American Journal of Science
Published
2008-04-01
Volume
308
Issue
4
Pages
421-468
ISSN
0002-9599 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077112971
Cited by
360
References
8
FWCI
10.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Precambrian crustal growth of Yangtze Craton as revealed by detrital zircon studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2475/04.2008.02
The paper
Liu, X., Gao, S., Diwu, C., & Ling, W. (2008). Precambrian crustal growth of Yangtze Craton as revealed by detrital zircon studies. American Journal of Science. https://doi.org/10.2475/04.2008.02

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.