The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Additional pollen analyses from southern New England
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Both pollen percentage and influx diagrams from the White Mountains show the stratigraphy identified in other regions of New England (Deevey 1943, 1951, 1958, Gaudreau and Webb 1985) (Figs.567).”
From Late Quaternary History of Low‐ and Mid‐Elevation Vegetation in the White Mountains of New Hampshire (1994) · cites this paper as Deevey 1943
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Hansen, H. P.: 1942, A pollen study of peat profiles from Lower Klamath Lake of Oregon and California. In: Cressman, op. cit., 1942, pp. 103-114.
- Patrick, R.: in press, Studies on Connecticut lake sediments. IV. The diatoms.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Late Quaternary History of Low‐ and Mid‐Elevation Vegetation in the White Mountains of New Hampshire
Spear, R. W., Davis, M. B., & Shane, L. C. K. (1994) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937056 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Deevey, E. S.
- Venue
- American Journal of Science
- Publisher
- American Journal of Science (AJS)
- Published
- 1943-12-01
- Volume
- 241
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 717-752
- ISSN
- 0002-9599
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
