The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Types and hypodigms
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fossil 'species' were units bounded by morphometric criteria rather than by genetic or behavioral ones.
“Ultimately, they acknowledged that fossil”
From What Is Evolution? A Response to Bamforth (2003) · cites this paper as Newell 1949
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What Is Evolution? A Response to Bamforth
O'Brien, M. J., Lyman, R. L., & Leonard, R. D. (2003) · American Antiquity · doi:10.2307/3557109 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Newell, N. D.
- Venue
- American Journal of Science
- Publisher
- American Journal of Science (AJS)
- Published
- 1949-02-01
- Volume
- 247
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 134-142
- ISSN
- 0002-9599
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
