Cited by 32

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Late-glacial and postglacial pollen diagrams from Maine

Deevey, E. S.·1951·American Journal of Science

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2475/ajs.249.3.177

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Bowman, P. W., 1931. Study of a peat bog near the Matamek River, Quebec, Canada, by the method of pollen analysis: Ecology, vol. 12, pp. 694-708.
  2. Deevey, E. S., 1939. Studies on Connecticut lake sediments. I. A postglacial climatic chronology for southern New England: Am. JouR. Scr., vol. 237, pp. 691-724. 1943. Additional pollen analyses from southern New England: Am. Jour. Sci., vol. 241, pp. 717-752. 1949. Biography of the Pleistocene. Part I: Europe and North America: Geol. Soc. America Bull., vol. 60, pp. 1315-1416. and Potzger, J. E., 1951 in press. Peat samples for radiocarbon analysis: problems in pollen statistics. Am. Joun. Sci., vol. 249.
  3. Firbas, Franz, 1934. Zur spät- und nacheiszeitlichen vegetations- geschichte der Rheinpfalz: Bot. Centralbl., Beih., vol. 52B, pp. 119-156. 1939. Vegetationsentwicklung und Klimawandel in der mitteleuropäischen Spät- und Nacheiszeit: Naturwiss., vol. 27, pp. 81-89, 104-108.
  4. Godwin, H., 1947. The late-glacial period: Sci. Progress, vol. 35, pp. 185-192.
  5. Groschopf, P., 1936. Die postglaziale Entwicklung des Grossen Plöner Sees in Ostholstein auf Grund pollenanalytischer Sedimentuntersuchungen: Archiv Hydrobiologie, vol. 30, pp. 1-84.
  6. Harshberger, J. W., 1911. Phytogeographic survey of North America, Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig. (Die Vegetation der Erde, ed. by Engler and Drude, vol. 13.)
  7. Jessen, Knud, 1949. Studies in late Quaternary deposits and flora-history of Ireland: Royal Irish Acad. Proc., vol. 52, sect. B, no. 6, pp. 85-290.
  8. Krauss, R. W., and Kent, G. N., 1944. Analyses and correlation of four New Hampshire bogs: Ohio Jour. Sci., vol. 44, pp. 11-17.
  9. Nichols, G. E., 1935. The hemlock-white pine-northern hardwood region of eastern North America: Ecology, vol. 16, pp. 403-422.
  10. Potzger, J. E., and Friesner, R. C., 1948. Forests of the past along the coast of southern Maine: Butler Univ. Bot. Studies, vol. 8, pp. 178-203.
  11. Sears, P. B., 1941. Postglacial vegetation in the Erie-Ohio area: Ohio Jour. Sci., vol. 41, pp. 225-234.
  12. , 1942. Forest sequences in the north central states: Bot. Gazette, vol. 103, pp. 751-761.
  13. Shreve, Forrest, 1917. A map of the vegetation of the United States: Geog. Rev., vol. 3, pp. 119-125.
  14. von Post, Lennart, 1946. The prospect for pollen analysis in the study of the Earth's climatic history: New Phytologist, vol. 45, pp. 193-217.
  15. Weaver, J. E., and Clements, F. E., 1929. Plant ecology, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York.
  16. Wenner, C. -G., 1947. Pollen diagrams from Labrador: Geog. Annaler, vol. 29, pp. 137-373.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 32

Metadata

Authors
Deevey, E. S.
Venue
American Journal of Science
Published
1951-03-01
Volume
249
Issue
3
Pages
177-207
ISSN
0002-9599
Cited by
32
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review