The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the theory of pollen analysis
Open accessAbstract
A consideration of the theoretical relationship between vegetational percentages and the percentages of pollen in sediments makes it obvious that where species differ in the amounts of pollen they contribute to sediments, pollen diagrams cannot be interpreted quantitatively by means of traditional methods. Under ideal conditions it should be possible, however, to interpret fossil pollen percentages objectively by means of correction for observed differences in pollen contribution. This method is described and demonstrated by its application to the Pine Pollen Zone in a pollen diagram from Vermont. The results imply that our previous subjective vegetational and climatic interpretation of this zone has been without validity. The departures of the real situation from the conditions of an ideal model are used to illustrate a general discussion of some of the subtle but potentially important sources of error that must be evaluated before pollen analysis can be used as a reliable paleoecologic technique.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fyfe, R. M., Woodbridge, J., & Roberts, N. (2015) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12776 · Cited by 196
Europe’s lost forests: a pollen-based synthesis for the last 11,000 years
Roberts, N., Fyfe, R. M., Woodbridge, J., Gaillard, M.-J., Davis, B. A. S., Kaplan, J. O., Marquer, L., Mazier, F., Nielsen, A. B., Sugita, S., et al. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-18646-7 · Cited by 196
Recent Centuries of Vegetational Change in the Glaciated North-Eastern United States
Russell, E. W. B., Davis, R. B., Anderson, R. S., Rhodes, T. E., & Anderson, D. S. (1993) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2261663 · Cited by 91
Holocene Vegetation Patterns in the Adirondack Mountains
Jackson, S. T., & Whitehead, D. R. (1991) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/2937204 · Cited by 90
Stevenson, A. C., & Harrison, R. J. (1992) · Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society · doi:10.1017/s0079497x00004175 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, M. B.
- Venue
- American Journal of Science
- Publisher
- American Journal of Science (AJS)
- Published
- 1963-12-01
- Volume
- 261
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 897-912
- ISSN
- 0002-9599 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2316452980
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the theory of pollen analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2475/ajs.261.10.897
- The paper
- Davis, M. B. (1963). On the theory of pollen analysis. American Journal of Science. https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.261.10.897
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.