Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 263

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Oxygen and hydrogen isotope studies of the serpentinization of ultramafic rocks in oceanic environments and continental ophiolite complexes

Open access
Wenner, D. B., Taylor, H. P.·1973·American Journal of Science

Abstract

Oxygen and hydrogen isotopic analyses have been obtained on 19 \noceanic chrysotiles and lizardites and l oceanic antigorite from dredge-hauls at three \nlocations along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (43°N, l°N, and 22°S), the Puerto Rican \nTrench, and the Blanco Fracture Zone in the Pacific Ocean. Lizardite-chrysotile serpentines \nwere also analyzed from continental ophiolite bodies at Vourinos, Greece \n(10 samples); San Luis Obispo, Calif. (16); Del Puerto, Calif. (4); Wilbur Springs, \nCalif. (l); Stonyford, Calif. (3); Canyon Mtn., Oreg. (3); and New Caledonia (3); in \naddition to 3 antigorites from Del Puerto. There is typically a wide variation in \nδO18 in a single ophiolite complex; the lowest δO18 values tend to occur in the interior, \npartially serpentinized portions of the ultramalic body. The isotopic compositions of \nthe oceanic and continental lizardite-chrysotile fall in different ranges (Oceanic: δD \n= -35 to -68, δO18 = +0.8 to +6.7; Vourinos: δD = -88 to -114, δO18 = +2.l to \n+12.7; San Luis Obispo: δD = -82 to -91, δO18 = +3.8 to +9.3; other ophiolites: \nδD = -80 to -149, δO18 = +6.3 to +9.2). Therefore, different types of waters must \nbe involved in the serpentinization of ophiolitic and oceanic ultramafic rocks. Heated \nocean water, perhaps mixed with some magmatic water, is apparently responsible for \nsubmarine serpentinization. Most of the lizardite-chrysotile in continental ophiolites \nprobably formed from hot, exchanged meteoric ground waters, mixed meteoric-magmatic \nwaters, and/or mixed meteoric-connate waters; the small quantities of antigorite \nin these bodies apparently form in the presence of non-meteoric metamorphic waters. \nThe isotopic evidence strongly suggests that most of the serpentine in ophiolite complexes \nwas not originally formed from ocean water. Some of the O18-depleted serpentines \nin the Vourinos and San Luis Obispo complexes can conceivably be interpreted \nas having formed in this manner, but if so, all these serpentines must have later \nundergone essentially total D/H exchange with other types of waters. Thus, if \nophiolite complexes truly represent exposures of oceanic crust and mantle, they probably \nwere largely unserpentinized prior to their emplacement on land.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2475/ajs.273.3.207

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wenner, D. B., & Taylor, H. P.
Venue
American Journal of Science
Published
1973-03-01
Volume
273
Issue
3
Pages
207-239
ISSN
0002-9599 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2111968610
Cited by
263
References
0
FWCI
5.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.