The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Slope Distributions, Threshold Hillslopes, and Steady-state Topography
Abstract
Digital elevation models of two “steady-state” mountain ranges, the Olympic Mountains (OM) and Oregon Coast Range (OCR), are used to examine relationships between slope distributions, the development of threshold hillslopes, and steady-state topography. Plots of drainage area versus slope for these mountain ranges exhibit substantial scatter that complicates comparison of range form to analytical theories and landscape evolution models. Contour plots of the density of such data reveal an attractor at the scale of the transition from hillslope processes to channel processes, and log-bin averaging reveals trends that parallel predictions of steady-state erosion laws but with different rate laws for five distinct process domains: hillslopes, valley heads, and colluvial, bedrock, and alluvial valley segments. Slope histograms computed for 100 km2 areas (defined by a 10 × 10 km grid) throughout the OM exhibit approximately normal or exponential distributions in areas of active rock uplift and depositional topography, respectively. Local slope distributions in the OCR also tend to be normally distributed, but some are left-skewed in areas with gentler slopes. Mean slopes determined both over the above referenced grid and a 10-km diam moving window are relatively invariant in the core of the OM in spite of strong contrasts in bedrock erodibility and gradients in long-term rock uplift rates. In contrast, the mean slopes in the OCR parallel latitudinal gradients in rock uplift rates and bedrock erodibility. Hence, the slope distributions in the OM and OCR reflect distinct relationships between development of threshold bedrock and soil-mantled hillslopes and steady-state topography.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Roering, J. J., Kirchner, J. W., & Dietrich, W. E. (1999) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/1998wr900090 · Cited by 705
Cited by
Earthquake‐Induced Chains of Geologic Hazards: Patterns, Mechanisms, and Impacts
Fan, X., Scaringi, G., Korup, O., West, A. J., van Westen, C. J., Tanyas, H., Hovius, N., Hales, T. C., Jibson, R. W., Allstadt, K. E., et al. (2019) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2018rg000626 · Cited by 1,021
Topographic controls on erosion rates in tectonically active mountain ranges
Montgomery, D. R., & Brandon, M. T. (2002) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/s0012-821x(02)00725-2 · Cited by 837
Self-citationEnvironmental signal propagation in sedimentary systems across timescales
Romans, B. W., Castelltort, S., Covault, J. A., Fildani, A., & Walsh, J. P. (2016) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.07.012 · Cited by 598
The size, distribution, and mobility of landslides caused by the 2015 Mw7.8 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal
Roback, K., Clark, M. K., West, A. J., Zekkos, D., Li, G., Gallen, S. F., Chamlagain, D., & Godt, J. W. (2018) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.01.030 · Cited by 543
Landslide erosion coupled to tectonics and river incision
Larsen, I. J., & Montgomery, D. R. (2012) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo1479 · Cited by 484
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Montgomery, D. R.
- Venue
- American Journal of Science
- Publisher
- American Journal of Science (AJS)
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 301
- Issue
- 4-5
- Pages
- 432-454
- ISSN
- 0002-9599 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-452X
- OpenAlex
- W1971670210
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Slope Distributions, Threshold Hillslopes, and Steady-state Topography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2475/ajs.301.4-5.432
- The paper
- Montgomery, D. R. (2001). Slope Distributions, Threshold Hillslopes, and Steady-state Topography. American Journal of Science. https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.301.4-5.432
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.