Cited by 57

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Water quality study of the Struma river basin, Bulgaria (1989–1998)

Simeonova, P., Simeonov, V., Andreev, G.·2003·Open Chemistry

Abstract

The present paper deals with an estimation of the water quality of the Struma river. Long-term trends, seasonal patterns and data set structures are studied by the use of statistical analysis. Nineteen sampling sites along the main river stream and different tributaries were included in the study. The sites are part of the monitoring net of the region of interest. Seventeen chemical indicators of the surface water have been measured in the period 1989–1998 in monthly intervals. It is shown that the water quality is relatively stable throughout the monitoring period, which is indicated by a lack of statistically significant trends for many of the sites and by chemical variables. Several seasonal patterns are observed at the sampling sites and four latent factors are identified as responsible for the data set structure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2478/bf02479264

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Struma River monitoring net
Fig. 1 Struma River monitoring netCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. S. Stefanov, V. Simeonov, S. Tsakovski: “Chemometrical Analysis of Waste Water Monitoring Data from Yantra River Basin, Bulgaria”, Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry, Vol. 70, (1999), pp. 473–482. · DOI
  2. V. Simeonov, S. Stefanov, S. Tsakovski: “Environmetrical Treatment of Water Quality Survey Data from Yantra River, Bulgaria”, Mikrochimica Acta, Vol. 132, (2000), pp. 15–21. · DOI
  3. S. Tsakovski, V. Simeonov, S. Stefanov: “Time-series Analysis of Long-Term Water Quality Records from Yantra River Basin, Bulgaria”, Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, Vol. 8, (1999), pp. 28–36.
  4. V. Simeonov: Principles of Analytical Data Treatment, University Press, Sofia, 1998.
  5. J.W. Einax, H.W. Zwanziger, S. Geiss: Chemometrics in Environmental Analysis, VCH, Weinheim, 1997. · DOI
  6. E. Foerster and B. Roenz: Methoden der Korrelations- und Regressionsanalyse, Die Wirtschaft, Berlin, 1979.
  7. R. Schlittingen and B.H. Jansen: Zeitreihenanalyse, Oldenburg, Muenchen, 1989.
  8. C. Chatfield: The Analysis of Time Series: An Introduction, 4 th Edition, Chapman and Hall, London, 1989.
  9. P.J. Brockwell and R.A. Davis: Time Series: Theory and Methods, Springer, Heidelberg, 1987. · DOI
  10. D.L. Massart and L. Kaufman: The Interpretation of Analytical Chemical Data by the Use of Cluster Analysis, J. Wiley, New York, 1983.
  11. B. Vanderginste, D.L. Massart, L. Buydens, S. De Jong, P. Lewi, J. Smeyers-Verbeke: Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1998.
  12. G. Thurston and J. Spengler: “A Quantitative Assessment of Source Contributions to Inhalable Particulate Matter Pollution in Metropolitan Boston”, Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 19, (1985), pp. 9–25. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Simeonova, P., Simeonov, V., & Andreev, G.
Venue
Open Chemistry
Published
2003-06-01
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
121-136
ISSN
2391-5420
Cited by
57
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review