Cited by 21scientometrics and bibliometrics researchLibrary Science and InformationInformation Science and Libraries

Applications of inferential statistical methods in library and information science

Open access
Zhang, Jin, Wang, Yanyan, Zhao, Yuehua, Cai, Xin·2018·Data and Information Management

Abstract

Research methods play an extremely important role in studies. Statistical methods are fundamental and vital for quantitative research. The authors of this paper investigated the research papers that used statistical methods including parametric inferential statistical methods, nonparametric inferential statistical methods, predictive statistical correlation methods, and predictive statistical regression methods in library and information science and examined the connections and interactions between statistical methods and their application areas including information creation, information selection and control, information organization, information retrieval, information dissemination, and information use. Both an inferential statistical method and graphic clustering visualization method were employed to explore the relationships between statistical methods and application areas and reveal the hidden interaction patterns. As a result, 1821 research papers employing statistical methods were identified among the papers published in six major library and information science journals from 1999 to 2017. The findings showed that application areas affected the types of statistical methods utilized. Studies in information organization and information retrieval tended to employ parametric and nonparametric inferential methods, while correlation and regression methods were applied more in studies in information use, information dissemination, information creation, and information selec…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2478/dim-2018-0007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of inferential statistics in the library science literature is increasing.

    “Given the continued pressure on libraries to quantitavely demonstrate their value and contribution to students' learning outcomes, and the increasing use of inferential statistics in the library science literature (Wallace 1985; Zhang, Wang, and Zhao 2017; Zhang et al. 2018)”

    From Unethical Numbers? A Meta-analysis of Library Learning Analytics Studies (2019) · cites this paper as Zhang et al. 2018

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, J., Wang, Y., Zhao, Y., & Cai, X.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
Corresponding author
Zhao, Yuehua
Venue
Data and Information Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
103-120
ISSN
2543-9251 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2887187944
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Data and Information Management (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Science and Libraries
Keywords
library and information science research, parametric statistics, nonparametric statistics, correlation analysis, regression analysis, information organization, information retrieval, information use, information dissemination, information creation, research methods course

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review