Cited by 11Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life ManagementLight effects on plantsFlowering Plant Growth and Cultivation

The storage ability of lamb’s lettuce cultivated in the greenhouse under LED or HPS lamps

Open access
Kołton, Anna, Wojciechowska, Renata, Długosz-Grochowska, Olga, Grzesiak, Wojciech·2014·Journal of Horticultural Research

Abstract

Leafy vegetables are the source of many valuable components like vitamins, minerals and phenolic compounds as antioxidants. Chlorophyll derivatives have antioxidant and anticarcinogenic activity, or may even act as signalling molecules in organisms. However, during the storage of the leafy vegetables in the cold and darkness, numerous biochemical changes usually occurs, demonstrated as the breakdown of chlorophyll. Storage ability of plants depends to some extent on the conditions under which plants grew. Lamb’s lettuce plants were grown in the greenhouse in different light regimes - emitted with sodium (HPS-control) and LED lamps (100% red, 90% red + 10% blue, 70% red + 30% blue and 50% red + 50% blue light). The intensity of radiation at the height of the leaves of the plants was the same in every treatment. After harvesting, the plants were stored at the temperature of 5 °C and high humidity in plastic bags. The analyses of the material were done four times: after harvest and three times during storage at weekly intervals. Fresh weight lost, dry matter, phenolics and chlorophyll content were analysed. Additionally, the fluorescence of chlorophyll a was carried out. Changes in plant fresh weight and dry matter content during storage did not depend on the lighting used during cultivation. After 3 weeks of storage, higher value of indicator of the vitality of PSII (PI ABS - Performance Index) was noticed in leaves treated with higher red light intensity during cultivation (100%, 90% and 70% red). LED lamps, which emitted 100% and 90% red light, enhanced concentration of total phenolics in lamb’s lettuce leaves. Light of HPS lamps decreased radical scavenging activity in leaves. Quality and usefulness of plants produced under LED lamps was just as good as those grown under HPS lamps.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2478/johr-2014-0033

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lesfrud et al., Kolton et al. and Ouzounis et al. declared that chlorophyll, lutein and β-carotene are mainly influenced by light.

    “Lesfrud et al. [53], Kolton et al. [54] and Ouzounis et al. [55] declared that chlorophyll, lutein and β-carotene are mainly influenced by light.”

    From Mars Regolith Simulant Ameliorated by Compost as in situ Cultivation Substrate Improves Lettuce Growth and Nutritional Aspects (2020) · cites this paper as [54]

    The Results state that light composition during growth did not affect pigment content in stored lamb’s lettuce. The paper also says it observed no effect of cultivation light source on chlorophyll or carotenoid content. It measured total carotenoids, not lutein and β-carotene separately. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Ferrante A., Maggiore T. 2007. Chlorophyll a fluores- cence measurements to evaluate storage time and temperature of Valeriana leafy vegetables. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 45: 73-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.02.003. · DOI
  2. Fukumoto L., Mazza G. 2000. Assessing antioxidant and prooxidant activities of phenolic compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 48(8): 3597-3604. DOI: 10.1021/jf000220w. · DOI
  3. Halliwell B. 2007. Dietary polyphenols: good, bad, or indifferent for your health? Cardiovascular re- search 73(2): 341-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.cardi- ores.2006.10.004. · DOI
  4. Hisaminato H., Murata M., Homma A. 2001. Relation- ship between the enzymatic browning and phenyl- alanine ammonia-lyase activity of cut lettuce, and the prevention of browning by inhibitors of poly- phenol biosynthesis. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 65(5): 1016-1021.
  5. Hogewoning S.W., Trouwborst G., Maljaars H., Poorter H., van Leperen W., Harbinson J. 2010. Blue light dose-responses of leaf photosynthesis, morphol- ogy, and chemical composition of Cucumis sativus grown under different combinations of red and blue light. J. Exp. Bot. 61(11): 3107-3117. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erq132. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Jung E.S., Lee S., Lim S.H., Ha S.H., Liu K.H., Lee C.H. 2013. Metabolite profiling of the short-term responses of rice leaves (Oryza sativa cv. Ilmi) cultivated under different LED lights and its cor- relations with antioxidant activities. Plant Science 210: 61-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.05.004. · DOI
  7. Li Q., Kubota C. 2009. Effects of supplemental light quality on growth and phytochemicals of baby leaf lettuce. Environmental and Experimental Botany 67: 59-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.envexp- bot.2009.06.011. · DOI
  8. Lichtenthaler H.K., Babani F. 2004. Light adaptation and senescence of the photosynthetic apparatus. Changes in pigment composition, chlorophyll flu- orescence parameters and photosynthetic activity. In: Papageorgiou G.C., Govindjee (Eds.), Chloro- phyll a Fluorescence: A Signature of Photosynthe- sis. Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration, Springer, Dordrecht 19: 713-736.
  9. Martyniak-Przybyszewska B. 2005. Yields of leaf beet (Beta vulgaris L. var. cicla L.) and lamb's lettuce (Valeiranella olitoria L.) grown in Olsztyn. Scien- tific works of the Lithuanian Institute of Horticul- ture and Lithuanian University of Agriculture. Hor- ticulture and Vegetable Growing 24(3): 196-200.
  10. Massa G.D., Kim H.H., Wheeler R.M., Mitchell C.A. 2008. Plant productivity in response to LED light- ing. HortScience 43(7): 1951-1956.
  11. Michalak A. 2006. Phenolic compounds and their anti- oxidant activity in plants growing under heavy metal stress. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 15(4): 523-530.
  12. Morrow R.C. 2008. LED lighting in horticulture. HortScience 43(7): 1947-1950.
  13. Panda D., Sarkar R.K. 2013. Natural leaf senescence: probed by chlorophyll fluorescence, CO2 photo- synthetic rate and antioxidant enzyme activities during grain filling in different rice cultivars. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 19(1): 43-51. DOI: 10.1007/s12298-012-0142-6. · DOI
  14. Paull R.E. 1999. Effect of temperature and relative hu- midity on fresh commodity quality. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 15(3): 263-277. DOI: 10.1016/S0925-5214(98)00090-8. · DOI
  15. Samoulienė G., Sirtautas R., Brazaitytė A., Duchovskis P. 2012. LED lighting and seasonality effects an- tioxidant properties of baby leaf lettuce. Food Chemistry 134: 1494-1499. DOI: 10.1016/j.food- chem.2012.03.061. · DOI
  16. Sharma O.P., Bhat T.K. 2009. DPPH antioxidant assay revisited. Food Chemistry 113(4): 1202-1205. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.08.008. · DOI
  17. Spinardi A., Ferrante A. 2012. Effect of storage tem- perature on quality changes of minimally pro- cessed baby lettuce. J. Food Agric. Environ. 10(1): 38-42.
  18. Strasser R.J., Tsimilli-Michael M., Srivastava A. 2004. Analysis of the chlorophyll a fluorescence transi- ent. In: Papageorgiou G.C., Govindjee (Eds.), Chlorophyll a Fluorescence: A Signature of Pho- tosynt-hesis. Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration Springer, Dordrecht 19: 321-362.
  19. Trouwborst G., Oosterkamp J., Hogewoning S.W., Har- binson J., van Ieperen W. 2010. The responses of light interception, photosynthesis and fruit yield of cucumber to LED-lighting within the canopy. Phys- iol. Plant. 138(3): 289-300. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399- 3054.2009.01333.x. · DOI
  20. Wellburn A.R. 1994. The spectral determination of chlo- rophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with spectrophotometers of differ- ent resolution. J. Plant Physiol. 144(3): 307-313. DOI: 10.1016/S0176-1617(11)81192-2. · DOI
  21. Wills R., McGlasson B., Graham D., Joyce D. 1998. Postharvest. An introduction to the physiology and handling of fruit, vegetables and ornamentals. 4th edition, UNSW Press.CAB International, 262 p.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kołton, A., Wojciechowska, R., Długosz-Grochowska, O., & Grzesiak, W.
Affiliations
  • University of Agriculture in Krakow (PL)
  • Institute of Electron Technology (PL)
Corresponding author
Kołton, Anna
Venue
Journal of Horticultural Research
Published
2014-12-01
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
159-165
ISSN
2300-5009 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099359044
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Horticultural Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
Keywords
lamb's lettuce, lettuce, postharvest storage, LED lighting, high-pressure sodium lamps, red and blue light, chlorophyll degradation, total phenolic content, antioxidant activity, chlorophyll fluorescence, cold storage, leafy vegetables

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review