The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Effect of Selected Plant Materials and Extracts on the Development of Bacterial Diseases on Onion
Open accessAbstract
The Effect of Selected Plant Materials and Extracts on the Development of Bacterial Diseases on Onion: The effects of Brassicaceae and Solanaceae plant residues and water extracts from these residues on the growth of onion ( Allium cepa L.) pathogenic bacteria Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum, Burkholderia cepacia and Burkholderia gladioli pv. alliicola were examined. The influence of these materials on the development of bacterial diseases on onion bulbs was also investigated. The toxic effect depended on the kind and amount of the agent used and also on the species of examined bacteria. The water extract from Brassica napus cv. Kana and water extract from Lycopersicon esculentum cv. Remiz decreased a density of three examined bacteria in nutrient broth medium. Also milled seeds of Brassica juncea cv. Małopolska expressed an inhibitory effect towards B. cepacia and B. gladioli pv. alliicola. However, milled seeds of B. napus cv. Kana used as an addition to liquid medium did not decrease the density of these bacteria. In the experiment on onion bulbs the most promising results were obtained for milled seeds of B. juncea cv. Małopolska. This material used both as a source of volatile compounds and also in direct contact with the inoculated place on the onion bulb, inhibited diseases development caused by all three examined bacteria. B. juncea contains very high concentration of 2-propenyl ITC and probably this compound caused decrease in density of bacteria and the reduction of disease development. Purified, commercially obtained 2-propenyl ITC proved a very strong antibacterial activity and also inhibited disease development on onion. The commercial products Funguran Easy 50 WP and Biosept 33SL were also used but they showed very weak activity in protection of onion against the tested bacteria.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“| Brassica napus and Tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) | Leaf, stem | Water extract | Bacterial disease on Onions”
From Efficacy of plant extracts in plant disease management (2012) · cites this paper as [44]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Efficacy of plant extracts in plant disease management
Gurjar, M. S., Ali, S., Akhtar, M., & Singh, K. S. (2012) · Agricultural Sciences · doi:10.4236/as.2012.33050 · Cited by 330
Metadata
- Authors
- Kowalska, B., & Smolińska, U.
- Affiliations
- Instytut Ogrodnictwa – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy (PL)
- Corresponding author
- Kowalska, Beata
- ORCID
- Kowalska, Beata
- Venue
- Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2008-01-01
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-45
- ISSN
- 1231-0948 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1984026601
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Garlic and Onion Studies
- Keywords
- onion, Erwinia carotovora, Burkholderia cepacia, Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, tomato, plant residues, plant extracts, antibacterial activity, volatile compounds, biological control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review