The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Administrative judiciary is looking for a balance in a crisis
Open accessAbstract
The article focuses on actual challenges of administrative justice in the Slovak Republic and Poland. The legal crisis and the crisis in law in both countries have common signs and necessarily differences. The authors analyze selected problems of administrative justice, which are connected by the current state of society marked by the crisis. In the part dedicated to the Slovak Republic and Poland, emphasis is placed on the crisis associated with changes in the judicial system and - additionally - in Poland it is the crisis associated with changes in the law caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to the nature of the researched topic, we have applied analysis, synthesis as well as comparison of legal regulations in the processing of this issue. However, in addition to the mentioned scientific methods of research, we also used scientific literature, case law and analogy of the law. The article can be beneficial by researching the development of problems associated with administrative justice in states with a similar historical development of society.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This validates conclusions drawn from corporate settings, provided there is an adaptation of both tools and managerial strategies (Skora et al. 2022).”
From How Do Digital Capabilities Affect Organizational Performance in the Public Sector? The Mediating Role of the Organizational Agility (2024) · cites this paper as Skora et al. 2022
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Atobishi, T., Moh’d Abu Bakir, S., & Nosratabadi, S. (2024) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci14020037 · Cited by 94
“This validates conclusions drawn from corporate settings, provided there is an adaptation of both tools and managerial strategies (Skora et al. 2022).”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- SKÓRA, A., SREBALOVÁ, M., & PAPÁČOVÁ, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (PL)
- Comenius University Bratislava (SK)
- Slovak National Museum (SK)
- Venue
- Juridical Tribune
- Published
- 2022-04-05
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2247-7195 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4226135553
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 12.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Juridical Tribune (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Administrative Law and Governance
- Social Sciences › Law › Polish Law and Legal System
- Social Sciences › Law › Judicial and Constitutional Studies
- Keywords
- administrative justice, crisis of law, judicial reform, COVID-19 pandemic, Slovakia, Poland, comparative law, case law
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review