The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Live Streaming of Court Proceedings in India: A Step Towards Strengthening the Access to a Transparent and an Accountable Judiciary
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: The objective of this research is to analyze the efficacy of the adoption of Court Proceedings’ Live Streaming in India as a means to strengthen access to a transparent and accountable Judiciary. The research also aims to examine existing global frameworks concerning court proceedings’ live streaming. Methods: This research utilizes a comprehensive analysis approach, examining the implementation and impact of Court Proceedings’ Live Streaming in India and globally. It involves reviewing existing literature, legal frameworks, and case studies to understand the various dimensions and implications of live streaming in the legal and judicial field. Results: The analysis reveals that Court Proceedings’ Live Streaming has significant potential to enhance transparency and accountability within the judiciary. It allows real-time access to courtroom proceedings, aligning with the open justice principle. However, it also highlights various concerns such as balancing the right to privacy of parties involved, addressing copyright ownership issues, mitigating cyber security threats, and preventing the dissemination of false information. The research identifies potential safeguards and measures to address these concerns effectively. Conclusion: In conclusion, Court Proceedings’ Live Streaming represents a significant development in the legal and judicial field, providing unprecedented access to courtroom proceedings. While it has the potential to enrich constitutionalism and empower the masses, it also necessitates careful consideration of various legal and ethical concerns. By implementing appropriate safeguards and measures, live streaming can contribute to a more transparent and accountable judiciary while ensuring the protection of rights and interests of all parties involved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Spigelman, James J., Seen to Be Done: The Principle of Open Justice (October 9, 1999). Australian Law Journal – Part 1, Vol. 74, p. 290, 2000, Australian Law Journal – Part 2, Vol. 74, p. 378, 2000, Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1800451.
- rd report on “Functioning of Virtual Courts / Court Proceedings through Video Conferencing.”
- The Model Rules for Live-streaming and Recording of Court Proceedings available at https://cdnbbsr.s3waas.gov.in/s388ef51f0bf911e452e8dbb1d807a81ab/uploads/2021/06/2022091599.pdf.”
- MODEL RULES FOR LIVE STREAMING AND RECORDING OF COURT PROCEEDINGS (hereinafter referredas (DraftRules) https://cdnbbsr.s3waas.gov.in/s388ef51f0bf911e452e8dbb1d807 a81ab/uploads/2021/06/2022091599.pdf
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaur, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Delhi (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Kaur, Harleen
- ORCID
- Kaur, Harleen
- Venue
- Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental
- Published
- 2024-05-03
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e06586
- ISSN
- 1981-982X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4396626508
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 1.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- dx.doi.org
- Locations
- Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Education, Law, and Society
- Social Sciences › Law › Judicial and Constitutional Studies
- Social Sciences › Law › Artificial Intelligence in Law
- Keywords
- live streaming of court proceedings, judicial transparency, judicial accountability, open justice, India, right to privacy, copyright ownership, cyber threats, disinformation, access to justice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Live Streaming of Court Proceedings in India: A Step Towards Strengthening the Access to a Transparent and an Accountable Judiciary. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.24857/rgsa.v18n9-075
- The paper
- Kaur, H. (2024). Live Streaming of Court Proceedings in India: A Step Towards Strengthening the Access to a Transparent and an Accountable Judiciary. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n9-075