The carbon sequestration potential of terrestrial ecosystems
Abstract
Terrestrial ecosystems, comprising vegetation and soil in uplands and wetlands, significantly impact the global carbon (C) cycle and, under natural conditions, are a sink of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4). However, conversion of natural to managed ecosystems (i.e., agroecosystems, urban lands, and mined lands) depletes ecosystem C stocks, aggravates gaseous emissions, and exacerbates radiative forcing. Thus, the onset of agriculture around 8000 BC presumably transformed these sinks into a source of greenhouse gases (GHGs) (Ruddiman 2003), mostly CO2, CH4, and nitrous oxide (N2O), and depleted the terrestrial (soil, vegetation, and peatlands) C stocks. Ruddiman (2005) estimated the depletion of the terrestrial C stock (soil and vegetation) by 456 Pg (502.65 × 109 tn) since the onset of agriculture. Of this, the historic depletion of soil organic carbon (SOC) stock is estimated at 130 to 135 Pg (143.3 × 109 to 148.8 × 109 tn) (Sanderman et al. 2017; Lal 2018). Therefore, recarbonization of some of the terrestrial biosphere (soil and vegetation) is an important strategy to mitigate the anthropogenic climate change (ACC) and enhance other ecosystem services because of the link between SOC stock and atmospheric concentration of CO2 (Trenberth and Smith 2005).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Contributions decrease to 11.1% and 4.5% for the most optimistic SOC sequestration rate estimate under the fast and slow assumptions, respectively; and to 4.0% and 1.6% for the more realistic initial SOC sequestration rate.
“Contributions decrease to 11.1% and 4.5% for the most optimistic SOC sequestration rate estimate (Lal et al., 2018) under the fast and slow assumptions, respectively; and to 4.0% and 1.6% for the more realistic initial SOC sequestration rate (3.3 Gt CO 2 year -1 by Bossio et al., 2020; Figure 1d,e).”
From Carbon for soils, not soils for carbon (2023) · cites this paper as Lal et al., 2018
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 76 · Cited by 394
- Authors
- Lal, R., Smith, P., Jungkunst, H. F., Mitsch, W. J., Lehmann, J., Nair, P. K. R., McBratney, A. B., de Moraes Sá, J. C., Schneider, J., Zinn, Y. L., Skorupa, A. L. A., Zhang, H.-L., Minasny, B., Srinivasrao, C., & Ravindranath, N. H.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- University of Koblenz and Landau (DE)
- Florida State University (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Universidade Federal de Lavras (BR)
- China Agricultural University (CN)
- National Academy of Agricultural Research Management (IN)
- Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 0022-4561 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-3300
- OpenAlex
- W2899925677
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 8
- FWCI
- 20.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (publishedVersion)
- NOT FOUND REPOSITORY (Indian Institute of Science Bangalore) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Keywords
- carbon sequestration, terrestrial ecosystems, soil organic carbon, carbon stocks, greenhouse gas emissions, soil carbon loss, agricultural land conversion, peatlands, climate change mitigation, carbon cycle
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review