Cited by 394Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesSoil erosion and sediment transport

The carbon sequestration potential of terrestrial ecosystems

Lal, Rattan, Smith, Pete, Jungkunst, Hermann F., Mitsch, William J., Lehmann, Johannes, Nair, P.K. Ramachandran, McBratney, Alex B., de Moraes Sá, João Carlos +7 more·2018·Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Abstract

Terrestrial ecosystems, comprising vegetation and soil in uplands and wetlands, significantly impact the global carbon (C) cycle and, under natural conditions, are a sink of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4). However, conversion of natural to managed ecosystems (i.e., agroecosystems, urban lands, and mined lands) depletes ecosystem C stocks, aggravates gaseous emissions, and exacerbates radiative forcing. Thus, the onset of agriculture around 8000 BC presumably transformed these sinks into a source of greenhouse gases (GHGs) (Ruddiman 2003), mostly CO2, CH4, and nitrous oxide (N2O), and depleted the terrestrial (soil, vegetation, and peatlands) C stocks. Ruddiman (2005) estimated the depletion of the terrestrial C stock (soil and vegetation) by 456 Pg (502.65 × 109 tn) since the onset of agriculture. Of this, the historic depletion of soil organic carbon (SOC) stock is estimated at 130 to 135 Pg (143.3 × 109 to 148.8 × 109 tn) (Sanderman et al. 2017; Lal 2018). Therefore, recarbonization of some of the terrestrial biosphere (soil and vegetation) is an important strategy to mitigate the anthropogenic climate change (ACC) and enhance other ecosystem services because of the link between SOC stock and atmospheric concentration of CO2 (Trenberth and Smith 2005).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2489/jswc.73.6.145a

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Contributions decrease to 11.1% and 4.5% for the most optimistic SOC sequestration rate estimate under the fast and slow assumptions, respectively; and to 4.0% and 1.6% for the more realistic initial SOC sequestration rate.

    “Contributions decrease to 11.1% and 4.5% for the most optimistic SOC sequestration rate estimate (Lal et al., 2018) under the fast and slow assumptions, respectively; and to 4.0% and 1.6% for the more realistic initial SOC sequestration rate (3.3 Gt CO 2 year -1 by Bossio et al., 2020; Figure 1d,e).”

    From Carbon for soils, not soils for carbon (2023) · cites this paper as Lal et al., 2018

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 76 · Cited by 394

Authors
Lal, R., Smith, P., Jungkunst, H. F., Mitsch, W. J., Lehmann, J., Nair, P. K. R., McBratney, A. B., de Moraes Sá, J. C., Schneider, J., Zinn, Y. L., Skorupa, A. L. A., Zhang, H.-L., Minasny, B., Srinivasrao, C., & Ravindranath, N. H.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • University of Koblenz and Landau (DE)
  • Florida State University (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Universidade Federal de Lavras (BR)
  • China Agricultural University (CN)
  • National Academy of Agricultural Research Management (IN)
  • Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
Venue
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Published
2018-11
Volume
73
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 0022-4561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-3300
OpenAlex
W2899925677
Cited by
394
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 8
FWCI
20.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (publishedVersion)
  • NOT FOUND REPOSITORY (Indian Institute of Science Bangalore) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
carbon sequestration, terrestrial ecosystems, soil organic carbon, carbon stocks, greenhouse gas emissions, soil carbon loss, agricultural land conversion, peatlands, climate change mitigation, carbon cycle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review