The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Engineers Engaging with Community: Negotiating Cultural Difference on Mine Sites
Open accessAbstract
In this paper we scrutinize the concepts of culture and cultural relativism and argue that, despite difference in academic interpretations, they have relevance for engineers in their working lives. Engineers, particularly those who work for transnational resource companies, often confront different belief systems when they work on site. This article looks at the misunderstandings that can arise from superficial readings of cultural relativism, as well as the productive relationships that can emerge when engineers engage in a meaningful way with other cultures and epistemologies. This type of engagement has the potential to transform engineering knowledge and practice. We argue that it is important for engineers to understand not just why, but also how, culture matters when negotiating an equitable relationship with the communities in which they work.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Armstrong and Baillie [2] argue this by emphasizing the importance of cultural relativism in engineering practices, noting that an equitable relationship between engineers and the community they interact with is essential for the sustainable success of engineering solutions [2, 3].”
From Robots for Social Justice (R4SJ): Toward a More Equitable Practice of Human-Robot Interaction (2024) · cites this paper as [2]
Citations
Cites
Abu‐Lughod, L. (2002) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1525/aa.2002.104.3.783 · Cited by 2,371
Argonauts of the Western Pacific
Malinowski, B. (2002) · doi:10.4324/9780203421260 · Cited by 2,160
Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E., & Gibson, C. B. (2013) · Culture and Group Processes · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199985463.003.0008 · Cited by 109
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Robots for Social Justice (R4SJ): Toward a More Equitable Practice of Human-Robot Interaction
Zhu, Y., Wen, R., & Williams, T. (2024) · Proceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3610977.3634944 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Armstrong, R., & Baillie, C.
- Affiliations
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- ORCID
- Baillie, Caroline
- Venue
- International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace
- Publisher
- Queen's University Library
- Published
- 2012-05-24
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-17
- ISSN
- 1927-9434 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2096515698
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 11.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- International Journal of Engineering Social Justice and Peace (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Development › Engineering Education and Global Impact
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Mining and Resource Management
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Education, Technology, and Ethics
- Keywords
- cultural relativism, culture, engineers, community participation, mining communities, cultural differences, epistemology, engineering knowledge, cultural misunderstandings
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engineers Engaging with Community: Negotiating Cultural Difference on Mine Sites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.24908/ijesjp.v1i1.3518
- The paper
- Armstrong, R., & Baillie, C. (2012). Engineers Engaging with Community: Negotiating Cultural Difference on Mine Sites. International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace. https://doi.org/10.24908/ijesjp.v1i1.3518