The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Lights, Camera, Redaction… Police Body-Worn Cameras; Autonomy, Discretion and Accountability
Open accessAbstract
Body-worn cameras are the modern equivalent of the police notebook.(Queensland Police Minister
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The self-awareness effect of BWCs is conditional on the extent to which the cameras are activated (Hedberg et al. 2017; Taylor 2016; Young and Ready 2016)”
From Paradoxical effects of self-awareness of being observed: testing the effect of police body-worn cameras on assaults and aggression against officers (2018) · cites this paper as Taylor 2016
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Ariel, B., Sutherland, A., Henstock, D., Young, J., Drover, P., Sykes, J., Megicks, S., & Henderson, R. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-017-9311-5 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, E.
- Affiliations
- Australian National University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Taylor, Emmeline
- ORCID
- Taylor, Emmeline
- Venue
- Surveillance & Society
- Publisher
- Queen's University Library
- Published
- 2016-05-09
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 128-132
- ISSN
- 1477-7487 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2410636839
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6
- FWCI
- 37.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Surveillance & Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
- Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Law and Evidence
- Social Sciences › Law › Law, Rights, and Freedoms
- Keywords
- police body cameras, police accountability, police discretion, autonomy, surveillance, redaction, transparency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
