Cited by 17Urological Disorders and TreatmentsGenital Health and DiseaseSexual function and dysfunction studies

Establishment of normative data for stretched penile length in Turkish preterm and term newborns

Open access
Halil, Halit, Oğuz, Şerife Suna·2017·The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

The aim of this study was to establish a normal range of preterm and term stretched penile length based on their gestational age and anthropometric parameters at birth. A total of 585 infants; 336 (57.43%) preterm and 249 (42.57%) term male infants born between August 2015 and September 2016 with gestational age between 26 and 41 weeks were included in our study. Stretched penile length was measured from the pubic ramus to the tip of the glans. Gestational age, stretched penile length and anthropometric parameters at birth (weight, length and head circumference) were recorded within the first three days of life. Variations of stretched penile length in relation to gestational age and anthropometric parameters were evaluated using multiple linear regression models. The mean stretched penile length ± SD of preterm and term neonates were 2.5±0.565 cm and 3.2±0.551cm, respectively. In all infants, stretched penile length was significantly affected by gestational age and birth length (OR: 0.079, 95% CI 0.059-0.098, p=0.0001, OR:0.022, 95% CI 0.007-0.037, p=0.005, respectively). In term infants, stretched penile length was significantly affected by gestational age (OR: 0.139, 95% CI 0.082-0.196, p=0.0001) and in preterm infants, gestational age and birth length significantly infleuenced the stretched penile length (OR: 0.090, 95% CI 0.065-0.0115, p=0.0001, OR:0.024, 95% CI 0.009-0.039, p=0.002, respectively). This study provides reference values of stretched penile length for term and viable preterm Turkish infants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24953/turkjped.2017.03.006

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Matsuo N, Ishii T, Takayama JI, Miwa M, Hasegawa T. Reference Standard of penile size and prevalence of buried penis in Japanese newborn male infants. Endocr J 2014; 61: 849-853.
  2. Alaee E, Gharib MJ, Fouladinejad M. Penile length and anogenital distance in male newborns from different Iranian ethnicities ingolestan province. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2014; 25: 1-4
  3. Park JY, Lim G, Oh KW et al. Penile length, digit length, and anogenital distance according to birth weight in newborn male infants. Korean J Urol 2015; 56: 248-253.
  4. El Kholy M, Hamza RT, Saleh M, Elsedfy H. Penile length and genital anomalies in Egyptian male newborns: epidemiology and influence of endocrine disruptors. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2013; 26: 509- 513.
  5. Kutlu AO. Normative data for penile length in Turkish newborns. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 2010; 2: 107- 110.
  6. Akin Y, Ercan O, Telatar B, Tarhan F. Penile size in term newborn infants. Turk J Pediatr 2011; 53: 301- 307.
  7. Ballard JL, Khoury JC, Wedig K, Wang L, Eilers- Walsman BL, Lipp R. New Ballard Score, expanded to include extremely premature infants. J Pediatr 1991; 119: 417-423.
  8. Cole TJ, Green PJ. Smoothing reference centile curves: The LMS method and Penalized Likelihood. Stat Med 1992; 11: 1305-1319.
  9. Kulkarni ML, Rajendran NK. Normal values for penile standards in newborns. Indian Pediatr 1991; 28: 1341- 1343.
  10. Vasudevan G, Manivarmane B, Bhat BV, Bhatia BD, Kumar S. Genital standards for south Indian male newborns. Indian J Pediatr 1995; 62: 593-596.
  11. Sutan-Assin M, Rukman J, Dahlan A. Penis dimensions of newborn infants. Paediatr Indones 1989; 29: 146-150.
  12. Hatipoğlu N, Kurtoğlu S. Micropenis: etiology, diagnosis and treatment approaches. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 2013; 5: 217-223.
  13. Cimador M, Catalano P, Ortolano R, Giuffrè M. The inconspicuous penis in children. Nat Rev Urol 2015; 12: 205-215.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Halil, H., & Oğuz, Ş. S.
Affiliations
Zekai Tahir Burak Kadın Sağlığı Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Corresponding author
Halil, Halit
Venue
The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics
Published
2017-06-28
Volume
59
Issue
3
Pages
269-273
ISSN
  • 0041-4301 (ISSN-L)
  • 2791-6421
OpenAlex
W2791248226
Cited by
17
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Genital Health and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
stretched penile length, reference values, preterm infants, term infants, gestational age, birth length, neonatal anthropometry, male infants, head circumference, birth weight, neonatal head circumference
MeSH terms
Anthropometry, Birth Weight, Gestational Age, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Male, Penis, Reference Values, Turkey

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review