Cited by 47Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Learning with Selective Forgetting

Open access
Shibata, Takashi, Irie, Go, Ikami, Daiki, Mitsuzumi, Yu·2021·Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Lifelong learning aims to train a highly expressive model for a new task while retaining all knowledge for previous tasks. However, many practical scenarios do not always require the system to remember all of the past knowledge. Instead, ethical considerations call for selective and proactive forgetting of undesirable knowledge in order to prevent privacy issues and data leakage. In this paper, we propose a new framework for lifelong learning, called Learning with Selective Forgetting, which is to update a model for the new task with forgetting only the selected classes of the previous tasks while maintaining the rest. The key is to introduce a class-specific synthetic signal called mnemonic code. The codes are "watermarked" on all the training samples of the corresponding classes when the model is updated for a new task. This enables us to forget arbitrary classes later by only using the mnemonic codes without using the original data. Experiments on common benchmark datasets demonstrate the remarkable superiority of the proposed method over several existing methods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24963/ijcai.2021/137

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 47

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Chuan Guo, Tom Goldstein, Awni Han- nun, and Laurens Van Der Maaten. Certified data removal from machine learning models. In Proc. ICML, pages 3832-3842, 2020.
  2. David Lopez-Paz and Marc'Aurelio Ranzato. Gradient episodic memory for continual learning. In Proc. NeurIPS, pages 6467-6476, 2017.
  3. Hanul Shin, Jung Kwon Lee, Jaehong Kim, and Jiwon Kim. Continual learning with deep gener- ative replay. In Proc. NeurIPS, pages 2990-2999, 2017.
  4. Wang et al., 2018a] Feng Wang, Jian Cheng, Weiyang Liu, and Haijun Liu. Additive margin softmax for face veri- fication. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 25(7):926-930, 2018.

Authors
Shibata, T., Irie, G., Ikami, D., & Mitsuzumi, Y.
Affiliations
NTT (Japan) (JP)
Venue
Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2021-08
Pages
989-996
OpenAlex
W3187088106
Cited by
47
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.08
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
selective forgetting, lifelong learning, watermarking, privacy preservation, data leakage, knowledge retention, continual learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review