Cited by 0Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

GRASP: Enhancing Zero-Shot Multi-Modal Anomaly Detection via Geometric Refinement and Semantic Prompting

Open access
Sun, Zhongbin, Cui, Yuze, Zhou, Yong·2026·Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Zero-shot multimodal anomaly detection is critical for identifying structural defects that are often invisible to traditional RGB images, particularly in scenarios lacking target domain samples. However, existing methodologies face two significant impediments: the prohibitive computational overhead caused by relying on multi-view rendering for depth processing, and the inability of static text prompts to adapt to fine-grained local anomalies. To address these challenges, a unified zero-shot multimodal anomaly detection framework GRASP is proposed. Firstly, a Frequency Domain Enhancement module is introduced to replace costly rendering with spectral transformations, directly synthesizing high-fidelity depth images for efficient utilization. Secondly, a Prompt-Conditioned Variational module is designed to bridge the semantic gap by grounding global textual descriptions into local visual nuances. Finally, a Dual Cross-Injection Alignment module is proposed to enable robust feature fusion for enhancing anomaly classification performance, while a Pyramid Anomaly Map Recalibration module further refines anomaly localization across multiple scales. Extensive experiments on MVTec 3D-AD and Eyecandies demonstrate that GRASP establishes a new state-of-the-art, yielding substantial improvements of 3.0 points in I-AUROC and 2.7 points in AUPRO compared to the SOTA method.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24963/ijcai.2026/185

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Authors
Sun, Z., Cui, Y., & Zhou, Y.
Affiliations
China University of Mining and Technology (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2026-09
Pages
1658-1666
OpenAlex
W7213400006
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2021QN1075)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Keywords
zero-shot anomaly detection, multimodal anomaly detection, 3D anomaly detection, frequency domain enhancement, cross-modal feature fusion, anomaly localization, structural defect detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review