The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Management of Allergies to Animals
Abstract
Allergy to animals affects between 15 to 30% of atopic persons and about the same proportion of all those who work with laboratory animals. The responsible allergens are contained in the urine, saliva, and secretions of furred animals. The allergens apparently dry on fur, bedding, or other fomites so that with disturbance, the antigen becomes airborne on particles or "vectors" of diverse size. Many of these vectors are small enough to remain airborne and reach the lower airway. They adhere to surfaces in the environment such as rugs, walls, and clothing, so that animal allergens are found in virtually every sample of household dust and in the air and surfaces throughout most research facilities. This creates a reservoir of allergen that makes total elimination of the allergen from any environment very difficult. It then becomes important to understand the minimum level of allergen capable of inducing symptoms in sensitized patients so strategies can be developed to reduce exposures to below these limits. Otherwise, management will depend on nearly complete avoidance of animal dander, a difficult task. Alternatively, it will be necessary to modify the allergic host with drugs or immunotherapy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Allergic reactions may be a consequence of animal contact and affect 15%-30% of individuals (often genetically) predisposed.
“Allergic reactions may be a consequence of animal contact and affect 15%–30% of individuals (often genetically) predisposed [116].”
From A One Health Perspective on the Human-Companion Animal Relationship with Emphasis on Zoonotic Aspects. (2020) · cites this paper as [116]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Overgaauw, P. A. M., Vinke, C. M., van Hagen, M. A. E., & Lipman, L. J. A. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17113789 · Cited by 301
“Allergic reactions may be a consequence of animal contact and affect 15%–30% of individuals (often genetically) predisposed [116].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Eggleston, P. A., & Wood, R. A.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Venue
- Allergy and Asthma Proceedings
- Publisher
- Oceanside Publications Inc.
- Published
- 1992-11-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 289-292
- ISSN
- 1088-5412 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1982602593
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Allergy and Asthma Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational exposure and asthma
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Asthma and respiratory diseases
- Keywords
- animal allergy, animal dander, occupational allergy, laboratory animal workers, allergen exposure, house dust, aeroallergens, allergen avoidance, allergen immunotherapy, antiallergic drugs, atopy
- MeSH terms
- Air Pollutants, Allergens, Animals, Animals, Domestic, Animals, Laboratory, Humans, Hypersensitivity, Occupational Exposure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review