Cited by 55Sinusitis and nasal conditionsAsthma and respiratory diseasesNasal Surgery and Airway Studies

Asthma Outcomes after Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Aspirin-Tolerant versus Aspirin-Induced Asthmatic Patients

Awad, Osama G., Fasano, Mary Beth, Lee, John H., Graham, Scott M.·2008·American Journal of Rhinology

Abstract

Background Certain diseases affect both upper and lower airways. Aspirin-induced asthma (AIA) is a clinical entity characterized by asthma, nasal polyposis, and aspirin intolerance. To understand the response of the lower airway to surgical treatment of the sinuses, we examined asthma outcomes in AIA compared with a second group of aspirin-tolerant asthmatic (ATA) patients to establish if there were any differences between the two groups after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Methods A retrospective record review was performed of 91 asthmatic subjects with chronic rhinosinusitis. Forty-one subjects had AIA and 50 subjects had ATA. Subjective and objective asthma outcome parameters were used to compare between the two groups at three time points: immediately before ESS and 6 and 12 months after ESS. Results Preoperatively, AIA patients had significantly higher asthma severity (p Conclusion AIA patients usually present with more severe asthma. The asthmatic complaints of AIA and ATA patients continue to improve significantly over 6 and 12 month after ESS. Although ESS helped both groups of patients, AIA had statistically significant better results compared with ATA patients in asthma severity scores and decreased need for ICS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3148

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Surgery may be beneficial in patients with nasal polyps with associated asthma, aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, or cystic fibrosis.

    “Surgery may be beneficial in patients with NP with associated asthma [228,229], AERD [230], or cystic fibrosis [231-233].”

    From Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [230]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Awad, O. G., Fasano, M. B., Lee, J. H., & Graham, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
Corresponding author
Graham, Scott M.
Venue
American Journal of Rhinology
Published
2008-03
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
197-203
ISSN
  • 1050-6586 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-6290
OpenAlex
W2062656759
Cited by
55
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Rhinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Keywords
aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, aspirin-tolerant asthma, endoscopic sinus surgery, chronic rhinosinusitis, asthma outcomes, asthma severity, inhaled corticosteroid dose reduction, nasal polyps, upper and lower airway interaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Aspirin, Asthma, Endoscopy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nasal Polyps, Paranasal Sinuses, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review