Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perspectives on the Etiology of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: An Immune Barrier Hypothesis

Open access
Kern, Robert C., Conley, David B., Walsh, William, Chandra, Rakesh, Kato, Atsushi, Tripathi-Peters, Anju, Grammer, Leslie C., Schleimer, Robert P.·2008·American Journal of Rhinology

Abstract

Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) has been defined as persistent symptomatic inflammation of the nasal and sinus mucosa resulting from the interaction of multiple host and environmental factors. Recent studies have implicated Alternaria fungi or toxigenic Staphylococcus aureus as critical agents in CRS pathogenesis. The emphasis on environmental agents in CRS etiology has focused interest toward elimination of those agents as the prime mechanism of therapy. This viewpoint is in marked contrast to the current perspective on some other chronic inflammatory epithelial disorders that afflict the skin, lungs, and gut, wherein host factors are believed to predispose to disease expression in the presence of ubiquitous environmental agents. Methods: The current review evaluates CRS etiology from this perspective and considers that CRS develops, in part, as an outcome of a dysfunctional host response. Specifically, evidence from our laboratory and others will be reviewed indicating that CRS is associated with a failure of the mechanical and immunologic barriers across the nasal mucosa. The hypothesis would further propose that genetic and epigenetic variation predisposes susceptible individuals to barrier failure in the presence of environmental stress leading to CRS. Results: From this unifying perspective, bacteria and fungi are seen as disease modifiers rather than primary etiologic agents. Conclusion: The goal is to place concepts of CRS pathophysiology in a framework consistent with a current understanding of chronic inflammation in general and epithelial disease in particular.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3228

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 89 references

Cited by

See all 317

Metadata

Authors
Kern, R. C., Conley, D. B., Walsh, W., Chandra, R., Kato, A., Tripathi-Peters, A., Grammer, L. C., & Schleimer, R. P.
Venue
American Journal of Rhinology
Published
2008-11
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
549-559
ISSN
  • 1050-6586 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-6290
OpenAlex
W1999233686
Cited by
317
References
89
FWCI
13.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perspectives on the Etiology of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: An Immune Barrier Hypothesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3228
The paper
Kern, R. C., Conley, D. B., Walsh, W., Chandra, R., Kato, A., Tripathi-Peters, A., Grammer, L. C., & Schleimer, R. P. (2008). Perspectives on the Etiology of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: An Immune Barrier Hypothesis. American Journal of Rhinology. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3228

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.