Cited by 106Advanced Drug Delivery SystemsBarrier Structure and Function StudiesHead and Neck Surgical Oncology

The blood-brain barrier and nasal drug delivery to the central nervous system

Miyake, Marcel Menon, Bleier, Benjamin S.·2015·American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a highly efficient system that separates the central nervous system (CNS) from general circulation and promotes selective transport of molecules that are essential for brain function. However, it also limits the distribution of systemically administered therapeutics to the brain; therefore, there is a restricted number of drugs available for the treatment of brain disorders. Several drug-targeting strategies have been developed to attempt to bypass the BBB, but none has proved sufficiently effective in reaching the brain. METHODS: The objective of this study is to generally review these strategies of drug administration to the CNS. RESULTS: Noninvasive methods of drug delivery, such as chemical and biologic transport systems, do not represent a feasible platform, whereas for most drugs, it is still not possible to achieve therapeutic levels within the brain tissue after intravenous or oral administration, and the use of higher potency or more concentrated doses may cause serious toxic side effects. Direct intrathecal drug delivery through a catheter into the CNS also presents several problems. Intranasal drug delivery is a potential alternative method due to the direct transport into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compartment along the olfactory pathway, but the study's conclusions are controversial. An endoscopic intranasal surgical procedure using established skull base surgery reconstruction techniques based on the use of a nasal mucosa surgical flap as the only obstacle between the nose and the subarachnoid space has appeared as a potential solution to increase the absorption of intranasal drugs to the CNS. CONCLUSION: Despite extensive efforts to develop new techniques to cross the BBB, none has proved sufficiently effective in reaching the brain, whereas minimizing adverse effects and the endoscopic mucosal grafting technique offers new potential promise.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2500/ajra.2015.29.4149

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 66 · Cited by 106

Authors
Miyake, M. M., & Bleier, B. S.
Affiliations
  • Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo (BR)
  • Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (US)
Venue
American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy
Published
2015-03
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
124-127
ISSN
  • 1945-8924 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-8932
OpenAlex
W2081176248
Cited by
106
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
FWCI
4.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
Keywords
blood-brain barrier, intranasal drug delivery, brain drug delivery, olfactory pathway, cerebrospinal fluid, skull base surgery, intrathecal drug delivery
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Animals, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System, Endoscopy, Humans, Nasal Mucosa, Olfactory Pathways, Subarachnoid Space, Surgical Flaps, Drug Delivery Systems, Skull Base, Plastic Surgery Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review