The blood-brain barrier and nasal drug delivery to the central nervous system
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a highly efficient system that separates the central nervous system (CNS) from general circulation and promotes selective transport of molecules that are essential for brain function. However, it also limits the distribution of systemically administered therapeutics to the brain; therefore, there is a restricted number of drugs available for the treatment of brain disorders. Several drug-targeting strategies have been developed to attempt to bypass the BBB, but none has proved sufficiently effective in reaching the brain. METHODS: The objective of this study is to generally review these strategies of drug administration to the CNS. RESULTS: Noninvasive methods of drug delivery, such as chemical and biologic transport systems, do not represent a feasible platform, whereas for most drugs, it is still not possible to achieve therapeutic levels within the brain tissue after intravenous or oral administration, and the use of higher potency or more concentrated doses may cause serious toxic side effects. Direct intrathecal drug delivery through a catheter into the CNS also presents several problems. Intranasal drug delivery is a potential alternative method due to the direct transport into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compartment along the olfactory pathway, but the study's conclusions are controversial. An endoscopic intranasal surgical procedure using established skull base surgery reconstruction techniques based on the use of a nasal mucosa surgical flap as the only obstacle between the nose and the subarachnoid space has appeared as a potential solution to increase the absorption of intranasal drugs to the CNS. CONCLUSION: Despite extensive efforts to develop new techniques to cross the BBB, none has proved sufficiently effective in reaching the brain, whereas minimizing adverse effects and the endoscopic mucosal grafting technique offers new potential promise.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Using intranasal administration, researchers have successfully treated memory loss in transgenic mice models of AD.
“Utilizing the intranasal administration technique, researchers have successfully treated memory loss in transgenic mice models of AD [198].”
From The Multifaceted Role of Neuroprotective Plants in Alzheimer’s Disease Treatment (2022) · cites this paper as [198]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 66 · Cited by 106
- Authors
- Miyake, M. M., & Bleier, B. S.
- Affiliations
- Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo (BR)
- Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 124-127
- ISSN
- 1945-8924 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-8932
- OpenAlex
- W2081176248
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 4.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
- Keywords
- blood-brain barrier, intranasal drug delivery, brain drug delivery, olfactory pathway, cerebrospinal fluid, skull base surgery, intrathecal drug delivery
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Intranasal, Animals, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System, Endoscopy, Humans, Nasal Mucosa, Olfactory Pathways, Subarachnoid Space, Surgical Flaps, Drug Delivery Systems, Skull Base, Plastic Surgery Procedures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review