Cited by 29Allergic Rhinitis and SensitizationAsthma and respiratory diseasesSinusitis and nasal conditions

Combination Therapy in Allergic Rhinitis: What Works and What Does Not Work

Greiwe, Justin C., Bernstein, Jonathan A.·2016·American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy

Abstract

Allergic rhinitis and other rhinitis subtypes are increasingly becoming some of the most prevalent and expensive medical conditions that affect the U.S. Population Both direct health care costs and indirect costs significantly impact the health care system due to delays in diagnosis, lack of treatment, ineffective treatment, poor medication adherence, and associated comorbidities. Many patients who have AR turn to over-the-counter medications for relief but often find themselves dissatisfied with the results. Determining the correct diagnosis, followed by initiation of the most-effective treatment(s), is essential to provide patients with better symptomatic management and quality of life. Although there are many options, currently available combination therapies, e.g., azelastine with fluticasone and intranasal corticosteroids with nasal decongestants, offer distinct advantages for the management of complex rhinitis phenotypes. Further research is required to investigate the pathomechanisms and biomarkers for mixed rhinitis and nonallergic vasomotor rhinitis subtypes that will lead to novel targeted therapies for these conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2500/ajra.2016.30.4391

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prolonged use of decongestants produces drug-induced rhinitis and organic nasal lesions and may cause serious systemic alterations.

    “However, the adverse effects of prolonged use of these drugs not only produce drug-induced rhinitis and organic nasal lesions, but may also be responsible for serious systemic alterations [119-124].”

    From Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [120]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greiwe, J. C., & Bernstein, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Bernstein Allergy Group, Cincinnati, Ohio
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
Corresponding author
Bernstein, Jonathan A.
Venue
American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy
Published
2016-11
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
391-396
ISSN
  • 1945-8924 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-8932
OpenAlex
W2550048721
Cited by
29
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
Keywords
allergic rhinitis, combination therapy, azelastine, fluticasone, intranasal corticosteroids, nasal decongestants, rhinitis phenotypes, health care costs, medication adherence, over-the-counter drugs, biomarkers
MeSH terms
Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Drug Therapy, Combination, Histamine Antagonists, Humans, United States, Nasal Decongestants, Treatment Outcome, Medication Adherence, Rhinitis, Allergic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review