Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 20Aging, Health, and DisabilityHealth and Well-being StudiesHealth Education and Validation

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record, with a small difference in title or year.

Confiabilidad y validez del Cuestionario de Calidad de Vida (WHOQOL-OLD) en adultos mayores mexicanos

Open access
Acosta-Quiroz·2013·Psicología y Salud

Abstract

El proposito de este estudio fue evaluar las propiedades psicometricas de confiabilidad y validez del Cuestionario de Calidad de Vida (WHOQOL-OLD) en adultos mayores del sur del estado de Sonora (Mexico). Se encuesto a 794 adultos mayores de entre 60 y 98 anos, mujeres y hombres, a quienes se les aplico, de manera individual, una hoja de datos sociodemograficos, el WHOQOL-OLD en espanol, la Escala de Depresion Geriatrica de Yesavage y la Escala de Bienestar Subjetivo de Lawton. En el citado cuestionario se evaluo validez divergente y convergente respecto a depresion y bienestar subjetivo, respectivamente; asi como su validez discriminante segun el sexo, grupo de edad, nivel educativo, estatus de salud y presencia o ausencia significativas de sintomas depresivos, validez factorial y consistencia interna de sus dimensiones y del total de los reactivos. El cuestionario mostro validez divergente respecto a la depresion, validez convergente en relacion al bienestar subjetivo, validez discriminante segun la edad, nivel educativo, estatus de salud y presencia significativa o no de sintomas depresivos. En el analisis factorial del instrumento se obtuvieron los seis factores que se mencionan en la literatura y que explican la varianza total. El citado cuestionario, en su version en espanol, es un instrumento confiable y valido para adultos mayores de la mencionada zona.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.25009/pys.v23i2.505

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

See all 20

Metadata

Authors
Acosta-Quiroz
Venue
Psicología y Salud
Publisher
Universidad Veracruzana
Published
2013-10-01
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
241-250
ISSN
1405-1109 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1805788814
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Locations
Psicología y Salud
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
WHOQOL-OLD, quality of life, older adults, psychometric properties, reliability statistics, validity, discriminant validity, convergent validity, factor structure, internal consistency, depression, subjective well-being, Spanish translation, Mexican older adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Confiabilidad y validez del Cuestionario de Calidad de Vida (WHOQOL-OLD) en adultos mayores mexicanos. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.25009/pys.v23i2.505
The paper
Acosta-Quiroz. (2013). Confiabilidad y validez del Cuestionario de Calidad de Vida (WHOQOL-OLD) en adultos mayores mexicanos. Psicología y Salud. https://doi.org/10.25009/pys.v23i2.505

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.