Cited by 156Technology's Impact on MediaEthics and Social Impacts of AIGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis

How Deepfakes and Artificial Intelligence Could Reshape the Advertising Industry: The Coming Reality of AI Fakes and Their Potential Impact on Consumer Behavior

Open access
Campbell, Colin, Plangger, Kirk, Sands, Sean, Kietzmann, Jan, Bates, Kenneth·2022·Journal of Advertising Research

Abstract

Creative artificial intelligence technologies (e.g., deepfakes, generative adversarial networks) are enabling new ways of producing and editing the audio and visual content in advertising. These new tools highly automate extreme changes to—and the entire generation of—advertisements. Examples range from changing a model’s skin tone, age, or gender to swapping the entire body or voice of a model. This investigation finds that these creative tools may cause potentially dramatic changes in how advertisements are conceived, produced, edited, and targeted. This paper explores these changes, along with related ethical issues and areas of needed research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2501/jar-2022-017

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A brand may appear with hallucinated qualities that misinform consumers or introduce expectations the firm cannot meet.

    “A brand may appear with hallucinated qualities that misinform consumers or introduce expectations the firm cannot meet (Campbell et al., 2022).”

    From Marketing to the Machine: Rethinking Global Marketing for the AI Era (2026) · cites this paper as Campbell et al., 2022

    The Perils section (page not available) warns that manipulated ads can spread authentic-appearing misinformation, confuse consumers, and alter brand meaning. It does not specifically say that brands may appear to have invented qualities or create expectations the firm cannot meet. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • At the representational level, generative systems actively construct category logics and evaluative frames.

    “At the representational level, generative systems actively construct category logics and evaluative frames, amplifying concerns about synthetic content, hallucination, and narrative distortion raised in emerging AI research (Campbell et al., 2022;González-Cantera & Bonacchi, 2025;Spennemann, 2023).”

    From Marketing to the Machine: Rethinking Global Marketing for the AI Era (2026) · cites this paper as Campbell et al., 2022

    The Perils section discusses deceptive synthetic advertising, authentic-looking misinformation, and the difficulty consumers may have recognizing fake content. It does not say that generative systems construct category logics or evaluative frames, or discuss hallucination. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Aaker, D. (1990), "Brand Extensions: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly," MIT Sloan Management Review 31, 4 (1990): 47.
  2. Araujo, T., Copulsky, J. R., Hayes, J. L., Kim, S. J., & Srivastava, J. "From purchasing exposure to fostering engagement: Brand-consumer experiences in the emerging computational advertising landscape." Journal of Advertising 49,4 (2020): 428-445.
  3. Arnauld, A, and P. Nicole. Logic or the Art of Thinking: Containing, besides common rules, several new observations appropriate for forming judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  4. Berthon, P., L. Pitt, and C. Campbell "Ad Lib: When Customers Create the Ad," California Management Review 50, 4 (2008): 6-30.
  5. Bloch, E. "The dialectical method." Man and World 16, 4 (1983): 281-313.
  6. Boden, M.A. "Creativity and artificial intelligence." Artificial Intelligence 103, 1-2 (1998): 347-356.
  7. Campbell, C., K. Plangger, S. Sands, and J. Kietzmann. "Preparing for an era of deepfakes and AI- generated ads: A framework for understanding responses to manipulated advertising." Journal of Advertising (2021): 1-17.
  8. Campbell, C., Sands, S., Ferraro, C., Tsao, H.Y.J. and Mavrommatis, A., "From data to action: How marketers can leverage AI." Business Horizons 63, 2 (2020): 227-243.
  9. Chen, G., P. Xie, J. Dong, and T. Wang "Understanding Programmatic Creative: The Role of AI," Journal of Advertising 48, 4 (2019): 347-355.
  10. Christensen, C.M. "The innovator's dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail." Harvard Business Review Press, 2013.
  11. Christensen, C.M., M.E. Raynor, and R. McDonald. "What is Disruptive Innovation," Harvard Business Review 93, 12 (2015): 44-53.
  12. de Miranda, L. "Artificial intelligence and philosophical creativity: From analytics to crealectics." Human Affairs 30, 4 (2020): 597-607.
  13. Deng, S., Tan, C. W., Wang, W., & Pan, Y. "Smart generation system of personalized advertising copy and its application to advertising practice and research." Journal of Advertising, 48,4 (2019): 356- 365.
  14. Goldfarb, A., and C. Tucker, "Online Display Advertising: Targeting and Obtrusiveness," Marketing Science, 30, 3 (2011): 389-404.
  15. Hayes, J. L., B.C. Britt, W. Evans, S.W. Rush, N.A. Towery, and A.C. Adamson. "Can social media listening platforms' artificial intelligence be trusted? Examining the accuracy of Crimson Hexagon's (now Brandwatch Consumer Research's) AI-Driven analyses." Journal of Advertising 50, 1 (2021): 81-91.
  16. Huang, J. "A Study on Programmatic Buying in the Era of Big Data," News Research 4 (2015): 58 -60.
  17. Iyer, G., D. Soberman, and J.M. Villas-Boas. "The Targeting of Advertising," Marketing Science 24, 3 (2005): 461-476.
  18. Kietzmann, J, J. Paschen, and E. Treen. "Artificial intelligence in advertising: How marketers can leverage artificial intelligence along the consumer journey." Journal of Advertising Research 58, 3 (2018): 263-267.
  19. Kietzmann, J., A.J. Mills, and K. Plangger. "Deepfakes: Perspectives on the future "reality" of advertising and branding." International Journal of Advertising 40, 3 (2020): 1-13.
  20. Kohavi, R., and S.H. Thomke "The Surprising Power of Online Experiments," Harvard Business Review Sept-Oct (2017): 74-82.
  21. Levitt, T. "Marketing Myopia." Harvard Business Review 82, 7/8 (2004): 138-149.
  22. Lou, D.C., H.K. Tso, and J.L. Liu "A Copyright Protection Scheme for Digital Images Using Visual Cryptography Technique," Computer Standards & Interfaces 29, 1 (2007): 125-131.
  23. Moreau, C.P. and D.W. Dahl "Designing the Solution: The Impact of Constraints on Consumers' Creativity," Journal of Consumer Research 32, 1 (2005): 13-22.
  24. Perot, E., and F. Mostert "Fake It Till You Make It: An Examination of the US and English Approaches to Persona Protection as Applied to Deepfakes on Social Media," Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 15, 1 (2020): 32-39.
  25. Qin, X. and Z. Jiang. "The Impact of AI on the Advertising Process: The Chinese Experience," Journal of Advertising 48, 4 (2019): 338-346.
  26. Rodgers, S. "Themed issue introduction: Promises and perils of artificial intelligence and advertising." Journal of Advertising 50,1 (2021): 1-10.
  27. Rosenthal, B., and E.P. Zamith Brito "The Brand Meaning Co-Creation Process on Facebook," Marketing Intelligence and Planning 35, 7 (2017): 923-936.
  28. Sullivan, M. "Brand Extensions: When to Use Them," Management Science 38, 6 (1992): 793-806.
  29. Summers, C.A., R.W. Smith, and R.W. Reczek "An Audience of One: Behaviorally Targeted Ads as Implied Social Labels," Journal of Consumer Research 43, 1 (2016): 156-178.
  30. Vakratsas, D. and Wang, X. "Artificial intelligence in advertising creativity." Journal of Advertising, 50, 1 (2020): 39-51.
  31. Watts, J., and A. Adriano. "Uncovering the sources of machine-learning mistakes in advertising: Contextual bias in the evaluation of semantic relatedness." Journal of Advertising 50, 1 (2021): 26- 38.
  32. Wee, T.T.T. "Extending Human Personality to Brands: The Stability Factor," Journal of Brand Management 11, 4 (2004): 317-330.
  33. Whittaker, L., Kietzmann, T. C., Kietzmann, J., & Dabirian, A. "'All around me are synthetic faces': The mad world of AI-generated media. IT Professional 22, 5 (2020): 90-99.
  34. Yan, J., N. Liu, G. Wang, W. Zhang, Y. Jiang, and Z. Chen "How Much Can Behavioral Targeting Help Online Advertising?" in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web, Association for Computing Machinery 26-70, (2009).
  35. Yang, G., Y. Liu, and X. Zhang "Research on the Application of Technologies in Smart Ad Design," Art Science and Technology 30, 5 (2017): 43.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Campbell, C., Plangger, K., Sands, S., Kietzmann, J., & Bates, K.
Affiliations
  • University of San Diego (US)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Victoria (CA)
Corresponding author
Campbell, Colin
Venue
Journal of Advertising Research
Published
2022-08-18
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
241-251
ISSN
  • 0021-8499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-1909
OpenAlex
W4292212959
Cited by
156
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 4
FWCI
23.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Advertising Research (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology's Impact on Media
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Keywords
deepfakes, generative adversarial networks, artificial intelligence in advertising, advertising production, face swapping, targeted advertising, AI ethics, creative tools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review