Cited by 248Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchBehavioral and Psychological StudiesChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Pivotal Response Intervention II: Preliminary Long-Term Outcome Data

Koegel, Lynn Kern, Koegel, Robert L., Shoshan, Yifat, McNerney, Erin·1999·Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps

Abstract

The literature and our observations suggest that self-initiations may be an especially important part of intervention for children with autism. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to conduct preliminary assessments as to whether self-initiations might be associated with highly favorable postintervention outcomes. In the first phase of this study, archival data were analyzed for 6 children. At intake, according to traditional variables, they appeared to have especially good prognoses for reducing symptoms of autism, but had extremely different outcomes (either exceptionally good or exceptionally poor) after years of intensive intervention. Results of Phase 1 indicated that the children who had highly favorable outcomes exhibited more spontaneous self-initiations at preintervention. Given these results, Phase 2 of the study assessed whether a series of self-initiations could be taught to children with autism who demonstrated few or no spontaneous self-initiations at preintervention, and whether this intervention would result in highly favorable postintervention outcomes. Results indicated that these children learned a variety of self-initiations and had extremely favorable outcomes. The results of this exploratory study are encouraging in terms of assessment of key pivotal target behaviors that may be identified as prognostic indicators, and that may be important during intervention for children with autism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2511/rpsd.24.3.186

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Young children with ASD who display stronger social approach ('wanting') and fewer avoidance behaviors at treatment onset are more responsive to early intensive behavioral interventions than are passive and avoidant children.

    “Young children with ASD who display stronger social approach (‘wanting’) and fewer avoidance behaviors at treatment onset are more responsive to early intensive behavioral interventions than are passive and avoidant children [198-202].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 248

Authors
Koegel, L. K., Koegel, R. L., Shoshan, Y., & McNerney, E.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
Koegel, Robert L.
Venue
Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps
Published
1999-09
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
186-198
ISSN
  • 0274-9483 (ISSN-L)
  • 0749-1425
OpenAlex
W2006252482
Cited by
248
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 19
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, self-initiation, long-term outcomes, prognostic factors, intensive intervention, children with autism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review