Chemical Composition and Anticandidal Activity of Essential Oils Obtained from Different Parts of Prangos heyniae H. Duman & M. F. Watso
Open accessAbstract
The chemical compositions and anticandidal activities of the essential oils from the aerial parts, inflorescence, and roots of the endemic P. heyniae H. Duman & M. F.Watson were evaluated. Hydrodistillation was used to isolate the essential oils and the chemical analyses were performed both by GC-FID and GC/MS, respectively. Forty-four compounds constituting 94.4% of aerial parts, thirty-nine compounds constituting 99.5% of inflorescence, and twenty-five compounds representing 100.0% of root essential oil were characterized. The main compounds of the aerial parts oil were elemol (36.2%), b-bisabolenal (14.1%), and germacrene D (12.7%). Main compounds of inflorescence oil were b-bisabolenal (21.6%) germacrene D (15.6%), and germacrene B (12.4%) while the roots oil were a-pinene (44.8%), limonene (15.3%), b-pinene (12.5%), and d-3-carene (10.2%), respectively. The in vitro anticandidal activity of the essential oils were evaluated against several Candida strains by using partly modified CLSI broth microdilution method M27-A2. The tested essential oil showed relatively weak effects against pathogenic Candida strains compared to standard antifungal agents.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The composition and extracted yield of essential oils depend on species, soil composition, plant organ, age, cycle stage, selected extraction method, and conditions of extraction.
“Various authors have reported that the composition and extracted yield of EOs depends on the species, soil composition, plant organ (aerial parts, inflorescence, or roots), age, cycle stage, selected extraction method, and conditions of extraction [2,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17].”
From Clove essential oil (Syzygium aromaticum L. Myrtaceae): Extraction, chemical composition, food applications, and essential bioactivity for human health (2021) · cites this paper as [8]
Section 2.2 reports different oil yields for aerial parts, inflorescences and roots, while Section 3.1 reports different compositions for those organs and discusses differences among species. Sections 3.1 and 3.3 also link composition to edaphic conditions. The cited paper does not establish the claimed effects of plant age, cycle stage, extraction method or extraction conditions on composition and yield. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAdvanced extraction methods including microwave-assisted extraction, ultrasonic-assisted extraction, subcritical fluid extraction, and supercritical fluid extraction improve extraction performance and reduce extraction time and energy consumption to obtain organic extracts.
“Advanced extraction methods, including microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE), subcritical fluid extraction, and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), improve extraction performance, reduce extraction time and energy consumption to obtain organic extracts [3,8,10].”
From Clove essential oil (Syzygium aromaticum L. Myrtaceae): Extraction, chemical composition, food applications, and essential bioactivity for human health (2021) · cites this paper as [8]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- K.H.C. Baser and N. Kirimer (2014). Essential oils of Anatolian Apiaceae -A Profile, Nat. Vol. Essent. Oils 1 (1), 1-50.
- Y. A. Menemen (2012). Prangos Lindl. In: A. Guner, S. Aslan, T. Ekim, M. Vural and M.T. Babac (Eds.) Türkiye bitkileri listesi (Damarlı bitkiler). Nezahat Gökyiğit Bahçesi ve Flora Araştırmaları Derneği Yayını. İstanbul.
- J. Mottaghipisheh, T. Kiss, B. Tóth and D. Csupor (2020). The Prangos genus: a comprehensive review on traditional use, phytochemistry, and pharmacological activities, Phytochem. Rev. 19, 1449- 1470.
- M. Kurkcuoglu, H. G. Agalar, A. Aksoy and K. H. C. Baser (2019). Composition of the essential oil of two endemic Helichrysum species in Turkey, Rec. Nat. Prod. 13 (3), 236-242
- National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (2002). Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; approved standard. Second edition, document M27-A2. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
- V.I. Babushok, P.J. Linstrom and I.G. Zenkevich (2011). Retention indices for frequently reported compounds of plant essential oils, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 2011, 40, 043101-1-043101-47.
- S. Sajadi, H. Zeynivand and Y. Shokouhinia (2009). Isolation and identification of osthol from the fruits and essential oil composition of the leaves of Prangos asperula Boiss., Res. Pharm. Sci. 4 (1), 19-23.
- F. Sefidkon, M.S. Khajavi and B. Malackpour (1998). Analysis of the oil of Prangos ferulacea (L.) Lindl., J. Essent. Oil Res. 10(1), 81-82.
- M. A. Massumi, M. R. Fazeli, S.H.R. Alavi and Y. Ajani (2007). Chemical constituents and antibacterial activity of essential oil of Prangos ferulacea (L.) Lindl. fruits, Iran. J. Pharm. Sci. 3(3), 171-176.
- M.B. Bahadori, G. Zengin, S. Bahadori, F. Maggi and L. Dinparast (2017). Chemical composition of essential oil, antioxidant, antidiabetic, anti-obesity, and neuroprotective properties of Prangos gaubae, Nat. Prod. Commun. 12 (12), 1945-1948.
- S. Masoudi, Z. Aghjanl, M. Yari and A. Rustaiyan (1999). Volatile constituents of Prangos latiloba Korov., J. Essent. Oil Res. 11 (6), 767-768.
- J.K. Rahman, D.M. Jaff and D. Dastan (2020). Prangos platychlaena Boiss essential oils: a novel study on its toxicity, antibacterial activity and chemical compoitions effect on burn rats, Iraqi J. Agric. Sci. 51(2), 519-529.
- G. Özek, T. Özek, K.H.C. Başer, A. Duran, M. Sagiroglu and H. Duman (2006). Comparison of the essential oils of Prangos turcica A. Duran, M. Sagiroglu & H. Duman fruits obtained by different isolation techniques, J. Essent. Oil Res. 18(5), 511-514.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Haro-González, J. N., Castillo-Herrera, G. A., Martínez-Velázquez, M., & Espinosa-Andrews, H. (2021) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules26216387 · Cited by 463 · see citing works
- Authors
- Karahisar, E., Köse, Y. B., İşcan, G., Kürkçüoğlu, M., & Tugay, O.
- Affiliations
- Selçuk University (TR)
- Anadolu University (TR)
- Selcuk University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Botany
- Corresponding author
- Karahisar, Esengül
- Venue
- Records of Natural Products
- Publisher
- ACG Publications
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 1307-6167 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3166032955
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Records of Natural Products (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Anadolu Üniversitesi
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Medicinal Plant Research
- Keywords
- essential oils, chemical composition, anticandidal activity, Candida, germacrene D, elemol, α-pinene, limonene, roots, inflorescence, aerial parts, antifungal activity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
