The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Performance and Lyapunov Stability of a Nonlinear Path Following Guidance Method
Abstract
Performance and stability are demonstrated for a nonlinear path-following guidance method for unmanned air vehicles. The method was adapted from a pure pursuit-based path following, which has been widely used in ground based robot applications. The method is known to approximate a proportional-derivative controller when following a straight line path, but it is shown that there is also an element of anticipatory control that enables tight tracking when following curved paths. Ground speed is incorporated into the computation of commanded lateral acceleration, which adds an adaptive capability to accommodate vehicle speed changes due to external disturbances such as wind. Asymptotic Lyapunov stability of the nonlinear guidance method is demonstrated when the unmanned air vehicle is following circular paths. The adaptive nature of the guidance method makes its stability independent of vehicle velocity. The stability analysis is also extended to show robust stability of the guidance law in the presence of saturated lateral acceleration, which is an inherent limitation of flight vehicles. Flight tests of the algorithm, using two small unmanned air vehicles, showed that each aircraft was controlled to within 1.6 m root mean square when following circular paths. The method was used to perform a rendezvous of the two aircraft, bringing them into very close proximity, within 12 m of along track separation and 1.4 m root mean square relative position errors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Real-Time Motion Planning With Applications to Autonomous Urban Driving
Kuwata, Y., Karaman, S., Teo, J., Frazzoli, E., How, J. P., & Fiore, G. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology · doi:10.1109/tcst.2008.2012116 · Cited by 889
Self-citation(2014) · IEEE Control Systems · doi:10.1109/mcs.2013.2287568 · Cited by 462
A perception‐driven autonomous urban vehicle
Leonard, J., How, J., Teller, S., Berger, M., Campbell, S., Fiore, G., Fletcher, L., Frazzoli, E., Huang, A., Karaman, S., et al. (2008) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.20262 · Cited by 429
Self-citationLiu, P., Chen, A. Y., Huang, Y.-N., Han, J.-Y., Lai, J.-S., Kang, S.-C., Wu, T.-H., Wen, M.-C., & Tsai, M.-H. (2014) · Smart Structures and Systems · doi:10.12989/sss.2014.13.6.1065 · Cited by 377
Sense and avoid technologies with applications to unmanned aircraft systems: Review and prospects
Yu, X., & Zhang, Y. (2015) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2015.01.001 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, S., Deyst, J., & How, J. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1718-1728
- ISSN
- 0731-5090 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-3884
- OpenAlex
- W2070735679
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance and Lyapunov Stability of a Nonlinear Path Following Guidance Method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2514/1.28957
- The paper
- Park, S., Deyst, J., & How, J. P. (2007). Performance and Lyapunov Stability of a Nonlinear Path Following Guidance Method. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.28957
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.