Cited by 113Advanced Aircraft Design and TechnologiesAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet FlowsComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Airframe Design for Silent Fuel-Efficient Aircraft

Abstract

The noise goal of the Silent Aircraft Initiative, a collaborative effort between the University of Cambridge and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, demanded an airframe design with noise as a prime design variable and a design philosophy that cut across multiple disciplines. This paper discusses a novel design methodology synthesizing first-principles analysis and high-fidelity simulations, and it presents the conceptual design of an aircraft with a calculated noise level of 62 dBA at the airport perimeter. This is near the background noise in a well-populated area, making the aircraft imperceptible to the human ear on takeoff and landing. The all-lifting airframe of the conceptual aircraft design also has the potential for improved fuel efficiency, as compared with existing commercial aircraft. A key enabling technology in this conceptual design is the aerodynamic shaping of the airframe centerbody. Design requirements and challenges are identified, and the resulting aerodynamic design is discussed in depth. The paper concludes with suggestions for continued research on enabling technologies for quiet commercial aircraft.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2514/1.46545

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. Manneville A., Journal of Aircraft, 43
  2. Crichton D., 2007, AIAA Paper, 56, 2007
  3. Hileman J. I., 2007, AIAA Paper, 51, 2007
  4. Liebeck R. L., Journal of Aircraft, 41
  5. Diedrich A., 2006, AIAA Paper, 23, 2006
  6. Plas A. P., 2007, AIAA Paper, 50, 2007
  7. Hall C. A., 2005, AIAA Paper, 64, 2005
  8. Hall C. A., 2006, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Paper GT2006-90559
  9. de la Rosa Blanco E., 2007, AIAA Paper, 54, 2007
  10. Agarwal A., 2006, AIAA Paper 2006-2618
  11. Law T., 2006, AIAA Paper 2006-2525
  12. Quayle A., 2007, AIAA Paper, 31, 2007
  13. Quayle, A. R. "Landing Gear for a Silent Aircraft," Ph.D. Dissertation,Engineering Department, Univ. of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, U.K.2008. · DOI
  14. Sakaliyski K. D., 2007, AIAA Paper, 32, 2007
  15. Shah P., 2007, AIAA Paper, 33, 2007
  16. Lilley G. M., Journal of Sound and Vibration, 239
  17. Herr M., AIAA Journal, 43
  18. Lockard D. P., 2004, NASA TM-2004-213013
  19. Sargeant M. A., Journal of Aircraft, 47
  20. 10.2514/6.2000-4740 · DOI
  21. Hileman J. I., 2006, AIAA Paper, 41, 2006
  22. 2006, Flow Solutions
  23. Jones A., 2006, Massachusetts Inst. of Technology
  24. Sargeant, M. A. "Boundary Layer Ingestion for Advanced Airframes," Ph.D. Dissertation,Department of Engineering, Univ. of Cambridge,2007.
  25. Drela M., 2004, AVL Overview
  26. Drela M., AIAA Journal, 25
  27. Drela M., 1993, AIAA Paper 93-0960
  28. Drela M., 2004, MSES Multi-Element Airfoil Design/Analysis Software: Summary
  29. Hoerner S. F., 1965, Hoerner Fluid Dynamics
  30. Raymer D. P., 1999, Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach
  31. Wakayama S., Journal of Aircraft, 32
  32. Diedrich A., 2005, Massachusetts Inst. of Technology
  33. Roskam, J., Airplane Design, Part 5: Component Weight Estimation, 2nd ed., Roskam Aviation and Engineering Corp., Ottawa,KS, 1989, pp.97-112.
  34. Crichton, D. "Fan Design and Operation for Ultra Low Noise," Ph.D. Dissertation,Department of Engineering, Univ. of Cambridge,2007. · DOI
  35. Thomas S., 2007, AIAA Paper, 66, 2007
  36. Rumsey C. L., 2006, NASA
  37. 2002, Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular 150/5300-13, Chap. 1, Sec.
  38. Lee J. J., Annual Review of Energy and the Environment/AR, 26
  39. Qin N., Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 40
  40. 2005, Federal Aviation Administration, Advisory Circular 120-27E, Chap. 2, Sec.
  41. 2000, 767-400ER Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning
  42. 2002, Federal Aviation Administration Regulation Sec. 25.125
  43. 10.2514/6.2006-2515 · DOI
  44. Andreou, C. "Acoustic and Aerodynamic Properties of Aerofoil Leading-Edge High-Lift Geometries," Ph.D. Dissertation,Department of Engineering, Univ. of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, U.K.2008. · DOI
  45. Peeters P. M., 2005, The Netherlands
  46. 2005, Toyota Motor Sales
  47. Hileman J. I., 2008, Proceedings of the 26th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, 1
  48. 2006, Part 36
  49. 2001, Federal Aviation Administration AC36-1H
  50. Tam R., 2007, AIAA Paper 2007-455
  51. Tam, R. "Regional Catalytic Economic Impacts and Noise-Damage Costs of Aviation Growth," Ph.D. Dissertation,Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Inst. of Technology, Cambridge, MA,2008.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hileman, J. I., Spakovszky, Z. S., Drela, M., Sargeant, M. A., & Jones, A.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Journal of Aircraft
Published
2010-05
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
956-969
ISSN
  • 0021-8669 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-3868
OpenAlex
W1979624609
Cited by
113
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Aircraft (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Boeing
  • Cambridge Trust
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Keywords
aircraft noise reduction, airframe design, fuel economy, conceptual aircraft design, commercial aircraft, design methodology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review