The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Multiclass Anomaly Detection in Flight Data Using Semi-Supervised Explainable Deep Learning Model
Abstract
The identification of precursors to safety incidents in aviation data is a crucial task, yet extremely challenging. The main approach in practice leverages domain expertise to define expected tolerances in system behavior and flags exceedances from such safety margins. However, this approach is incapable of identifying unknown risks and vulnerabilities. Various machine-learning approaches have been investigated and deployed to identify anomalies, with the great challenge of procuring enough labeled data to achieve reliable and accurate performance. This paper presents an explainable deep semi-supervised model for anomaly detection in aviation, building upon recent advancements described in the machine-learning literature. The proposed model combines feature engineering and classification in feature space, while leveraging all available data (labeled and unlabeled). Our approach is validated with case studies of anomaly detection during the takeoff and landing phases of commercial aircraft. Our model outperforms the state-of-the-art supervised anomaly-detection model, reaching significantly higher accuracy and fewer false alarms, even if only small proportion of data in the training set is labeled.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In the past two decades, most research on anomaly detection has focused on improving the accuracy of the detection, while largely ignoring the explainability of the corresponding methods and thus leaving the explanation of outcomes to practitioners.”
From A Survey on Explainable Anomaly Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [141]
In the citing paper
“Poor explanation fidelity”
From A Survey on Explainable Anomaly Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [141]
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 10 · Cited by 28
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- 10.3390/aerospace7060073 · DOI
- 10.2514/1.I010941 · DOI
- 10.2514/1.I010394 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSMCC.2008.2007248 · DOI
- Matthews B., 2010, Proceedings of 2013 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference
- 10.1016/j.aei.2020.101071 · DOI
- 10.3390/aerospace7080115 · DOI
- 10.2514/1.I010329 · DOI
- 10.7551/mitpress/9780262033589.001.0001 · DOI
- van der Maaten L., 2008, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9, 2579
Metadata
- Authors
- Memarzadeh, M., Matthews, B., & Templin, T.
- Affiliations
- Ames Research Center (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Aerospace Information Systems
- Published
- 2022-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 83-97
- ISSN
- 2327-3097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3204620932
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 1.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Aerospace Information Systems (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ames Research Center (80ARC020D0010, NNA16BD14C)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software System Performance and Reliability
- Keywords
- aviation safety, flight data, semi-supervised learning, explainable deep learning, commercial aircraft, false alarm reduction, feature engineering, unlabeled data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiclass Anomaly Detection in Flight Data Using Semi-Supervised Explainable Deep Learning Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2514/1.i010959
- The paper
- Memarzadeh, M., Matthews, B., & Templin, T. (2022). Multiclass Anomaly Detection in Flight Data Using Semi-Supervised Explainable Deep Learning Model. Journal of Aerospace Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.i010959