Multidisciplinary Optimization in Conceptual Design of Mixed-Stream Turbofan Engines
Abstract
Conceptual engine design is currently done essentially using a trial-and-erro r process based on the experience of engineers. This paper presents an alternative approach using mult {disciplinary optimization to automate the conceptual design phase and ensure that an optimal design is reached. A robust integrated computer program was created to find the values of eight basic engine parameters that minimized fuel usage over a given mission. Because of the character of the objective function, a new approach was devised incorporating a genetic algorithm with a switch to a gradient-based algorithm to refine the design. The new procedure was used to optimize the engine design for a conceptual short-range interceptor. The process is general, however, and can be applied to a wide variety of missions and aircraft.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Heuristics and meta-heuristic techniques are still the dominant solution techniques in the literature of FCO.
“Heuristics and meta-heuristic techniques are still the dominant solution techniques in the literature of FCO [10,58,66,68,118,120,176].”
From Fuel consumption optimization in air transport: a review, classification, critique, simple meta-analysis, and future research implications (2015) · cites this paper as [68]
GAs has been proven to be a highly effective and efficient tool in solving complex aircraft design, and some of their successful applications in the optimization of fuel consumption models have been proposed in the literature.
“GAs has been proven to be a highly effective and efficient tool in solving complex aircraft design, and some of their successful applications in the optimization of fuel consumption models have been proposed in the literature [58,68,176].”
From Fuel consumption optimization in air transport: a review, classification, critique, simple meta-analysis, and future research implications (2015) · cites this paper as [68]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Singh, V., & Sharma, S. K. (2015) · European Transport Research Review · doi:10.1007/s12544-015-0160-x · Cited by 95 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nadon, L. J. J. P., Kramer, S. C., & King, P. I.
- Affiliations
- Department of National Defence (CA)
- Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Propulsion and Power
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-22
- ISSN
- 0748-4658 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-3876
- OpenAlex
- W1983555530
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Propulsion and Power (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Government of Canada
- Canadian Armed Forces
- Air Force Institute of Technology
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Aerospace Engineering and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization
- Keywords
- multidisciplinary design optimization, fuel consumption reduction, genetic algorithm, gradient-based optimization, interceptor aircraft, engine parameter optimization, design process automation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review