Cited by 5Aerospace Engineering and ApplicationsAdvanced Aircraft Design and TechnologiesTurbomachinery Performance and Optimization

Multidisciplinary Optimization in Conceptual Design of Mixed-Stream Turbofan Engines

Nadon, Luc J. J. P., Kramer, Stuart C., King, Paul I.·1999·Journal of Propulsion and Power

Abstract

Conceptual engine design is currently done essentially using a trial-and-erro r process based on the experience of engineers. This paper presents an alternative approach using mult {disciplinary optimization to automate the conceptual design phase and ensure that an optimal design is reached. A robust integrated computer program was created to find the values of eight basic engine parameters that minimized fuel usage over a given mission. Because of the character of the objective function, a new approach was devised incorporating a genetic algorithm with a switch to a gradient-based algorithm to refine the design. The new procedure was used to optimize the engine design for a conceptual short-range interceptor. The process is general, however, and can be applied to a wide variety of missions and aircraft.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2514/2.5412

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Nadon, L. J. J. P., Kramer, S. C., & King, P. I.
Affiliations
  • Department of National Defence (CA)
  • Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (US)
Venue
Journal of Propulsion and Power
Published
1999-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
17-22
ISSN
  • 0748-4658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-3876
OpenAlex
W1983555530
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Propulsion and Power (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Government of Canada
  • Canadian Armed Forces
  • Air Force Institute of Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Aerospace Engineering and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization
Keywords
multidisciplinary design optimization, fuel consumption reduction, genetic algorithm, gradient-based optimization, interceptor aircraft, engine parameter optimization, design process automation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review