Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 190

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Structural damage assessment using a generalized minimum rank perturbation theory

Kaouk, Mohamed, Zimmerman, David C.·1994·AIAA Journal

Abstract

Recently, the authors proposed computationally attractive algorithms to determine the location and extent of structural damage for undamped structures assuming damage results in a localized change in stiffness properties. The algorithms make use of a finite-element model and a subset of measured eigenvalues and eigenvectors. The developed theories approach the damage location and extent problem in a decoupled fashion. First, a theory is developed to determine the location of structural damage. With location determined, a damage extent theory is then developed. The damage extent algorithm is a minimum rank perturbation, which is consistent with the effects of many classes of structural damage on a finite-element model. In this work, the concept of the minimum rank perturbation theory (MRPT) is adopted to determine the damage extent on the mass properties of an undamped structure. In addition, the MRPT is extended to the case of proportionall y damped structures. For proportionally damped structures, the MRPT is used to find the damage extent in any two of the three structural property matrices (mass, damping, or stiffness). Finally, illustrative case studies using both numerical and actual experimental data are presented. HE advent of the Space Shuttle has prompted considerable attention to the design and control of large space structures. Due to the large size and complexity of envisioned structures, as well as the use of advanced materials to reduce structural weight, it may become necessary to develop a structural health monitoring system to detect and locate structural damage as it occurs. From experience gained in the machinery health monitoring field, one would expect the vibration signature of the structure, either frequency response functions and/or modal parameters, to provide useful information in determining the location and extent of structural damage. Assume that a refined finite element model (FEM) of the structure has been developed before damage has occurred. By refined, we mean that the measured and analytical modal properties are in agreement. Next, assume that at a later date some form of structural damage has occurred. If significant, the damage will result in a change in the structures modal parameters. The question is: can the discrepancy between the original FEM modal properties and postdamage modal properties be used to ascertain structural damage? Most prior work in damage detection has used the general framework of FEM refinement (system identification) in the development of damage assessment algorithms. The motivation behind the development of FEM refinement techniques is based on the need to validate engineering FEMs before their acceptance as the basis for final design analysis. The standard problem has been to seek a refined FEM that is as close to the original FEM and whose modal properties are in agreement with those that are measured subject to various constraints such as symmetry and sparsity preservation. A considerable amount of work in this area has been

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2514/3.12061

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 190

Metadata

Authors
Kaouk, M., & Zimmerman, D. C.
Venue
AIAA Journal
Published
1994-04
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
836-842
ISSN
  • 0001-1452 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-385X
OpenAlex
W2103001773
Cited by
190
References
0
FWCI
55.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structural damage assessment using a generalized minimum rank perturbation theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2514/3.12061
The paper
Kaouk, M., & Zimmerman, D. C. (1994). Structural damage assessment using a generalized minimum rank perturbation theory. AIAA Journal. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12061

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.