Cited by 69Planetary Science and ExplorationSoil Mechanics and Vehicle DynamicsGeotechnical and construction materials studies

Lunar Surface Stabilization via Sintering or the Use of Heat Cured Polymers

Hintze, Paul, Curran, Jerry, Back, Teddy·2009·47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition

Abstract

Two potential methods for lunar surface stabilization are: 1) sintering the regolith into a solid and 2) using heat or UV cured polymers. Sintering, a method in which powders are fused into a solid, has been proposed as a way of building lunar launch pads, roads and other building materials. Polymers are currently used by the military to stabilize sandy soils, and adaptations of this technology may be effective for lunar surface stabilization. This paper describes ongoing work at NASA Kennedy Space Center on these two technologies. A solar concentrator has been built to provide the heat source for sintering. Various solvent free polymers have been investigated. Results of physical testing, including load strength and abrasion resistance, on field and laboratory prepared samples are presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2514/6.2009-1015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hintze et al. constructed a 1 m2 solar concentrator that produced a highest measured temperature of 1350°C, well above the temperature required to melt JSC-1 regolith simulant.

    “Hintze et al. [155] constructed a 1 m 2 solar concentrator, comprising a Fresnel lens installed on a frame designed to track the sun and collect solar energy for sintering JSC-1 regolith simulant. The highest measured temperature produced by the concentrator was 1350 ◦ C, well above the temperature required to melt the regolith simulant.”
  • For the solar sintering, solar concentrating approaches should be applied to reach the needed high temperature, e.g., by means of Fresnel lens or mirrors.

    “For the solar sintering, solar concentrating approaches should be applied to reach the needed high temperature, e.g., by means of Fresnel lens or mirrors. 61”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 14 · Cited by 69

Authors
Hintze, P., Curran, J., & Back, T.
Affiliations
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (US)
  • ASRC Aerospace, NASA
Venue
47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition
Published
2009-01-05
OpenAlex
W2313589944
Cited by
69
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.18
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
Keywords
sintering, lunar regolith, lunar construction, solar concentrators, abrasion resistance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review