Cited by 29Space Exploration and TechnologySpaceflight effects on biologySpacecraft Design and Technology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Overview of Carbon Dioxide Control Issues During International Space Station/Space Shuttle Joint Docked Operations

Open access
Matty, Christopher·2010·40th International Conference on Environmental Systems

Abstract

Crewed space vehicles have a common requirement to remove the carbon dioxide (CO2) created by the metabolic processes of the crew. The space shuttle [Space Transportation System (STS)] and International Space Station (ISS) each have systems in place that allow control and removal of CO2 from the habitable cabin environment. During periods in which the space shuttle is docked to the ISS, known as "joint docked operations," the space shuttle and ISS share a common atmosphere environment. During this period, an elevated amount of CO2 is produced through the combined metabolic activity of the STS and ISS crews. This elevated CO2 production, together with the large effective atmosphere created by collective volumes of the docked vehicles, creates a unique set of requirements for CO2 removal. This paper will describe individual CO2 control plans implemented by STS and ISS engineering teams, as well as the integrated plans used when both vehicles are docked. The paper will also discuss some of the issues and anomalies experienced by both engineering teams.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2514/6.2010-6251

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Williams D. E., 2003, ICES 2003-01-2491
  2. Matty C. M., 2008, ICES 2008-01-1969
  3. Reysa R.P., 2007, ICES 2007-01-3181
  4. Matty C.M., 2009, CDRA Status for ULF3, presentation given to NASA ISS Vehicle Control Board
  5. James J.T.., 2007, ICES2007-01-3218
  6. Rogers K., FlightReadinessReview, 2004

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Matty, C.
Affiliations
Johnson Space Center (US)
Corresponding author
Matty, Christopher
Venue
40th International Conference on Environmental Systems
Published
2010-07-11
OpenAlex
W2139255929
Cited by
29
References
5
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.27
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Conference on Environmental Systems (ICES) (publishedVersion)
  • NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Exploration and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
Keywords
carbon dioxide removal, International Space Station, Space Shuttle, spacecraft cabin air

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review