The DOI matches its Crossref record.
International Space Station Water Balance Operations
Open accessAbstract
In November 2008, the Water Regenerative System racks were launched aboard Space Shuttle flight, STS-126 (ULF2) and installed and activated on the International Space Station (ISS). These racks, consisting of the Water Processor Assembly (WPA) and Urine Processor Assembly (UPA), completed the installation of the Regenerative (Regen) Environmental Control and Life Support Systems (ECLSS), which includes the Oxygen Generation Assembly (OGA) that was launched 2 years prior. With the onset of active water management on the US segment of the ISS, a new operational concept was required, that of water balance . In November of 2010, the Sabatier system, which converts H2 and CO2 into water and methane, was brought on line. The Regen ECLSS systems accept condensation from the atmosphere, urine from crew, and processes that fluid via various means into potable water, which is used for crew drinking, building up skip-cycle water inventory, and water for electrolysis to produce oxygen. Specification (spec) rates of crew urine output, condensate output, O2 requirements, toilet flush water, and drinking needs are well documented and used as the best guess planning rates when Regen ECLSS came online. Spec rates are useful in long term planning, however, daily or weekly rates are dependent upon a number of variables. The constantly changing rates created a new challenge for the ECLSS flight controllers, who are responsible for operating the ECLSS systems onboard ISS from Mission Control in Houston. This paper reviews the various inputs to water planning, rate changes, and dynamic events, including but not limited to: crew personnel makeup, Regen ECLSS system operability, vehicle traffic, water storage availability, and Carbon Dioxide Removal Assembly (CDRA), Sabatier, and OGA capability. Along with the inputs that change the various rates, the paper will review the different systems, their constraints, and finally the operational challenges and means by which flight controllers manage this new concept of "water balance."
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“So even nowadays, all of the methods used for air revitalization are physicochemical and not regenerative (Junaedi et al., 2011; Tobias et al., 2011).”
From Use of Photobioreactors in Regenerative Life Support Systems for Human Space Exploration (2021) · cites this paper as Tobias et al., 2011
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [1]1. D.A. Yeoman, B. Shkedi, and B. Tobias, ISS Water Architecture and Operational Plan, SAE International Technical Paper: 08ICES-0123, 38 th International Conference on Environmental Systems, June 30-July 3, San Francisco, CA
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Use of Photobioreactors in Regenerative Life Support Systems for Human Space Exploration
Fahrion, J., Mastroleo, F., Dussap, C.-G., & Leys, N. (2021) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.699525 · Cited by 75
‘A review of algal research in space’.
Niederwieser, T., Kociolek, P., & Klaus, D. (2018) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.03.026 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Tobias, B., Garr, J., & Erne, M.
- Affiliations
- Johnson Space Center (US)
- Venue
- 41st International Conference on Environmental Systems
- Published
- 2011-07-17
- OpenAlex
- W2056895617
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.24
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- International Conference on Environmental Systems (ICES) (publishedVersion)
- NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Exploration and Technology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Space exploration and regulation
- Keywords
- International Space Station, water balance, water management, regenerative life support, oxygen production, condensate, environmental control and life support systems, carbon dioxide removal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review