Cited by 33Spacecraft Design and TechnologySpace Exploration and TechnologyPlanetary Science and Exploration

Evaluation of Surface Modification as a Lunar Dust Mitigation Strategy for Thermal Control Surfaces

Open access
Gaier, James, Waters, Deborah, Banks, Bruce, Misconin, Robert, Crowder, Mark·2011·41st International Conference on Environmental Systems

Abstract

Three surface treatments were evaluated for their ability to lower the adhesion between lunar simulant dust and AZ93, AlFEP, and AgFEP thermal control surfaces under simulated lunar conditions. Samples were dusted in situ and exposed to a standardized puff of nitrogen gas. Thermal performance before dusting, after dusting, and after part of the dust was removed by the puff of gas, were compared to perform the assessment. None of the surface treatments was found to significantly affect the adhesion of lunar simulants to AZ93 thermal control paint. Oxygen ion beam texturing also did not lower the adhesion of lunar simulant dust to AlFEP or AgFEP. But a workfunction matching coating and a proprietary Ball Aerospace surface treatment were both found to significantly lower the adhesion of lunar simulants to AlFEP and AgFEP. Based on these results, it is recommended that all these two techniques be further explored as dust mitigation coatings for AlFEP and AgFEP thermal control surfaces.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2514/6.2011-5183

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deposition of levitated lunar particles on exposed equipment surfaces causes obscuration of solar panels, dimness of optical surfaces, degradation of thermal surface performance, false measurements by instruments and frequent replacement of costly devices.

    “The majority of the levitated adhesive particles fall back toward the lunar surface (See Fig. 1) and deposit on the exposed equipment surfaces, causing obscuration of solar panels (Mazumder et al., 2003), dimness of optical surfaces, degradation of thermal surface performance (Gaier et al., 2011), false measurements by instruments and frequent replacement of costly devices.”
  • The majority of levitated adhesive particles fall back toward the lunar surface and deposit on exposed equipment surfaces.

    “The majority of the levitated adhesive particles fall back toward the lunar surface (See Fig. 1) and deposit on the exposed equipment surfaces, causing obscuration of solar panels (Mazumder et al., 2003), dimness of optical surfaces, degradation of thermal surface performance (Gaier et al., 2011), false measurements by instruments and frequent replacement of costly devices.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. J.R. Gaier, "Effect of Lunar Simulant Type on the Absorptivity and Emissivity of Dusted Thermal Control Surfaces in a Simulated Lunar Environment," International Conference on Environmental Systems 2010, AIAA-2010-6111. Also NASA/TM-2010-216786.
  2. L.A. Taylor, Y. Liu, and A. Zhang, "Shape and Size Relationship of Several Lunar Dusts: Preliminary Results," 40 th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2009) 2106.pdf.
  3. J.J. Grossman, et al., "Microchemical, Microphysical and Adhesive Properties of Lunar Material," Proceedings of the Apollo 11 Lunar Science Conference, Vol. 3, pp. 2171-81.
  4. W.M. Farrell, et al., "Complex Electric Fields Near the Lunar Terminator: The Near-Surface Wake and Accelerated Dust," Geophys. Res. Let., Vol. 34, L14201, doi: 10.1029/2007GL029312 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Z. Sternovsky, et al., "Contact Charging of Lunar and Martian Dust Simulants," J. Geophys. Res. Vol. 107, E11, 5105, doi: 10.1029/2002JE001897 (2002). · DOI
  6. J.R. Gaier and E.A. Sechkar, "Lunar Simulation in the Lunar Dust Adhesion Bell Jar," Proceedings of the 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting (2007).
  7. J.R. Gaier, J. Siamidis, and E.M.G. Larkin, "Extraction of Thermal Performance Values from Samples in the Lunar Dust Adhesion Bell Jar," 25 th Space Simulation Conference, NASA/CP-2008-214164.
  8. J. R. Gaier, "Measurement of the Solar Absorptivity and Thermal Emissivity of Lunar Simulants," International Conference on Environmental Systems 2010, AIAA-2010-6025. Also NASA/TM-2010-216788.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gaier, J., Waters, D., Banks, B., Misconin, R., & Crowder, M.
Affiliations
  • Glenn Research Center (US)
  • Alphaport, Inc.
  • Ball Aerospace
Venue
41st International Conference on Environmental Systems
Published
2011-07-17
OpenAlex
W2159707166
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.33
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Conference on Environmental Systems (ICES) (publishedVersion)
  • NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Glenn Research Center
  • Johnson Space Center
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Exploration and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
Keywords
lunar dust mitigation, thermal control surfaces, dust adhesion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review