Cited by 13Spacecraft Dynamics and ControlSpace Satellite Systems and ControlSpacecraft Design and Technology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Attitude Determination and Control System Design for a 6U CubeSat for Proximity Operations and Rendezvous

Franquiz, Francisco J., Edwards, Peter, Udrea, Bogdan, Nayak, Michael V., Pueschl, Thorsten·2014·AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference

Abstract

The work presented in this paper focuses on the design of an attitude determination and control subsystem (ADCS) for a proximity operation and imaging satellite mission. The ARAPAIMA (Application for Resident Space Object Proximity Analysis and IMAging) mission is carried out by a 6 U CubeSat class satellite equipped with a warm gas propulsion system. The propulsion system comprises an orbital maneuvering thruster which produces 100 mN and a set of 16 reaction control system (RCS) thrusters, of 25 mN each, installed in pairs that generate torques about each of the satellite body axes. The thrust of the RCS thrusters can be modulated over the entire range in steps of 1% due to the rapid solenoid valve actuation. The requirement of the control system is to provide pointing control accuracy of 1 arcmin at 3 σ in the desired imaging direction. The ADCS employs two control laws. One control law, for large angle maneuvers, implements eigenaxis maneuvering and the other, for accurate pointing, is implemented with PID controllers about each body axis. Simulations performed for tracking the resident space object flying in a circular orbit of 500 km altitude from a relative orbit of 250 m are used to test the performance of the ADCS. A comparison between a “traditional” ADCS system with reaction wheels and RCS thrusters for their off-loading, and a system with only RCS thrusters has been performed. The accuracy of the pointing is comparable, the pointing performance as well as the prop…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2514/6.2014-4421

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Harris K., 2013, AIAA
  2. Shuster M. D., 1993, The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 41, 439
  3. Simulink M. ., 2013, Aerospace Blockset User's Guide
  4. Wertz J. R., 2011, Space Mission Engineering: The New SMAD
  5. Schutz B., 2004, Statistical Orbit Determination
  6. 2013, Aerospace Toolbox User's Guide
  7. Bird G. A., 1994, Molecular Gas Dynamics And The Direct Simulation Of Gas Flows, 10.1093/oso/9780198561958.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Maus S., 2010, NOAA NESDIS/NGDC
  9. 10.1016/j.asr.2011.03.036 · DOI
  10. Curtis H., 2013, Elsiever Aerospace Engineering Series, Butterworth-Heinemann
  11. Dodge F. T., 2010, The New Dynamic Behavior of Liquids in Moving Containers
  12. Huang A., 2014, Personal Communication
  13. 10.2514/3.20418 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1117/12.857992 · DOI
  15. 10.2514/3.19988 · DOI
  16. 10.2514/3.21555 · DOI
  17. 10.1109/37.526915 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Franquiz, F. J., Edwards, P., Udrea, B., Nayak, M. V., & Pueschl, T.
Affiliations
  • Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University (US)
  • Red Sky Research, LLC
  • dSPACE GmbH
Venue
AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference
Published
2014-08-01
OpenAlex
W2331881159
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3
FWCI
3.93
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
Keywords
attitude determination and control system, CubeSat, proximity operations, spacecraft rendezvous, controller switching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review