The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Attitude Determination and Control System Design for a 6U CubeSat for Proximity Operations and Rendezvous
Abstract
The work presented in this paper focuses on the design of an attitude determination and control subsystem (ADCS) for a proximity operation and imaging satellite mission. The ARAPAIMA (Application for Resident Space Object Proximity Analysis and IMAging) mission is carried out by a 6 U CubeSat class satellite equipped with a warm gas propulsion system. The propulsion system comprises an orbital maneuvering thruster which produces 100 mN and a set of 16 reaction control system (RCS) thrusters, of 25 mN each, installed in pairs that generate torques about each of the satellite body axes. The thrust of the RCS thrusters can be modulated over the entire range in steps of 1% due to the rapid solenoid valve actuation. The requirement of the control system is to provide pointing control accuracy of 1 arcmin at 3 σ in the desired imaging direction. The ADCS employs two control laws. One control law, for large angle maneuvers, implements eigenaxis maneuvering and the other, for accurate pointing, is implemented with PID controllers about each body axis. Simulations performed for tracking the resident space object flying in a circular orbit of 500 km altitude from a relative orbit of 250 m are used to test the performance of the ADCS. A comparison between a “traditional” ADCS system with reaction wheels and RCS thrusters for their off-loading, and a system with only RCS thrusters has been performed. The accuracy of the pointing is comparable, the pointing performance as well as the prop…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Harris K., 2013, AIAA
- Shuster M. D., 1993, The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 41, 439
- Simulink M. ., 2013, Aerospace Blockset User's Guide
- Wertz J. R., 2011, Space Mission Engineering: The New SMAD
- Schutz B., 2004, Statistical Orbit Determination
- 2013, Aerospace Toolbox User's Guide
- Bird G. A., 1994, Molecular Gas Dynamics And The Direct Simulation Of Gas Flows, 10.1093/oso/9780198561958.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- Maus S., 2010, NOAA NESDIS/NGDC
- 10.1016/j.asr.2011.03.036 · DOI
- Curtis H., 2013, Elsiever Aerospace Engineering Series, Butterworth-Heinemann
- Dodge F. T., 2010, The New Dynamic Behavior of Liquids in Moving Containers
- Huang A., 2014, Personal Communication
- 10.2514/3.20418 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1117/12.857992 · DOI
- 10.2514/3.19988 · DOI
- 10.2514/3.21555 · DOI
- 10.1109/37.526915 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
3CAT-2: Attitude Determination and Control System for a GNSS-R Earth Observation 6U CubeSat Mission
Cortiella, A., Vidal, D., Jané, J., Juan, E., Olivé, R., Amézaga, A., Munoz, J. F., Carreno-Luengo, P. V. H., & Camps, A. (2016) · European Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.5721/eujrs20164940 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Franquiz, F. J., Edwards, P., Udrea, B., Nayak, M. V., & Pueschl, T.
- Affiliations
- Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University (US)
- Red Sky Research, LLC
- dSPACE GmbH
- ORCID
- Nayak, Michael V.
- Venue
- AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference
- Published
- 2014-08-01
- OpenAlex
- W2331881159
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 3.93
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
- Keywords
- attitude determination and control system, CubeSat, proximity operations, spacecraft rendezvous, controller switching
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review