The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 28 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales
Open accessAbstract
In this work, the reasons for the proliferation of tourist routes and cultural itineraries as a global phenomenon together with the consequences that these can trigger in the territories where they are introduced are analysed. A typology of routes is established and the controversial concept of Cultural Itinerary based on the proposals of the European Council and ICOMOS is studied. Various projects involving routes and historical paths in the Ayabaca mountain range (Piura, Peru) are then examined, as are the potential impacts that the creation of these tourist products can suppose for the development of the populations where they are applied. It is considered in this paper that these projects lack a holistic vision of heritage that would promote its value as a whole, thereby preventing the potential fragmentation of the territory as regards encouraging some zones to the detriment of others.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The article argues that the global proliferation of tourist routes and cultural itineraries is driven by territorial marketing and expanding heritage categories, but often instrumentalizes and fragments local heritage. Using a typology of routes and four proposed projects in Peru’s sierra de Ayabaca, it contends that externally designed routes lack a holistic vision and subordinate local populations and non-historical heritage.
Key findings
- The paper proposes a typology of routes: specific heritage routes (ethnological, historical/archaeological, natural), historical roads/cultural itineraries; imagined routes (literary-cinematic-TV, historical/fictional personalities, magical/esoteric/mythical/legendary); and generic/mixed routes or circuits (Table 1).
- It documents an institutional controversy: the Council of Europe promotes open, identity/cooperation/development-oriented itineraries (European Institute of Cultural Itineraries created in 1997; Camino de Santiago named first European Cultural Itinerary in 1987 and UNESCO World Heritage in 1993), while ICOMOS demands historical authenticity/continuity and distinguishes two types, with most recognized itineraries being historically purposive routes such as Qhapaq Ñan or Roman roads. UNESCO recognized Patrimonial Routes/Cultural Itineraries as a specific category in 2005.
- In the sierra de Ayabaca (Piura, Peru), four projects are analyzed: Ruta Montero-Ayabaca-Aypate (generic/mixed), Corredor Turístico Loja-Ayabaca (natural heritage), Proyecto Binacional de Turismo Rural en el Tramo Norte del Camino Inca (Loja-Aypate) (archaeological), and Programa Integral Qhapaq Ñan (historical road). None has materialized due to the area’s peripheral location, poor infrastructure, campesino population without tourism experience, and scarce economic resources.
- The paper concludes that these projects lack a holistic heritage vision, promote selected heritage types (especially archaeological/natural) over ethnological/ecological ones, treat local populations as passive/subsidiary, and risk territorial fragmentation and economic imbalances by promoting route corridors at the expense of adjacent areas.
Methods
- Conceptual/critical review and typology-building, drawing on academic literature and institutional documents from the Council of Europe, ICOMOS, UNESCO, and others.
- Case-study analysis of four route projects in the sierra de Ayabaca (Piura, Peru), based on project diagnoses/reports by NGOs, consultants, and public agencies; no primary fieldwork or quantitative analysis is reported.
- Comparative analysis of route types, heritage discourses, and potential territorial impacts.
Limitations
- The paper states that none of the four Ayabaca projects has been implemented, so its impact discussion is prospective/potential rather than observed.
- It acknowledges that the community-based tourism alternative it favors has difficulties and weaknesses (“dificultades y debilidades que el modelo entraña”).
- Evident from the text: the article does not present a systematic empirical methodology or primary data; it relies on secondary/project documents, and the case is limited to one Andean border region, so findings may not generalize.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
69 Own interpretation · 41 No basis given · 18 Sources not found · 5 Not checked yet · 1 Own result
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“En toda esta recreación, el patrimonio arqueológico es presentado como un vestigio de un tiempo anterior, mítico, que se emplaza en un territorio vacío y aislado en la virginal selva alta ecuatorial andina.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“En este sentido, los elementos del patrimonio etnológico destacados (creencias, mitos, formas de organización social, actividades económicas, manifestaciones festivas, rituales, indumentaria, gastronomía, etc.) lo son en cuanto a pervivencias recreadas de un modo de vida incaico que se presenta como imperturbable.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“las entidades participantes han realizado un inventario de recursos patrimoniales de la zona, con el único objetivo de transformarlos en productos turísticos.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sin embargo, dadas las limitaciones metodológicas y el superficial trabajo de investigación, este instrumento convencional no permite verificar con rigor la situación de partida y las potenciales ventajas competitivas de la ruta.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: La sierra de Ayabaca (Piura, Perú) contiene un patrimonio etnológico, ecológico y arqueológico muy rico.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sobre esta propuesta territorial previa fue elaborado un diagnóstico, que sugiere la creación de una típica ruta genérica o mixta formada por toda una variedad de recursos ambientales y patrimoniales carente de un hilo conductor que proporcione un contenido temático integrador y coherente.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
hedgeddirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: La sierra de Ayabaca (Piura, Perú) contiene un patrimonio etnológico, ecológico y arqueológico muy rico.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“En el artículo se plantea que los proyectos de rutas diseñados en el área de estudio carecen de una visión holística del patrimonio que promueva su puesta en valor como conjunto, por lo que fragmentan el territorio al dinamizar unas zonas en detrimento de otras.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: La sierra de Ayabaca (Piura, Perú) contiene un patrimonio etnológico, ecológico y arqueológico muy rico.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A diferencia de etapas pasadas en las que lo habitual era que la oferta la constituyera un destino específico -ya fuera éste un paraje, localidad, monumento del pasado o espacio para el placer-, en la actualidad la oferta se diversifica al comercializarse un territorio completo que, bajo un denominador común, trata de conducir a los visitantes siguiendo un recorrido definido y delimitado.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Marketing territorial y proliferación de rutas culturales
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“La oferta de circuitos es similar a la del turismo de masas, pues suele combinar en “un todo incluido” el alojamiento, la manutención, la movilidad y la visita a los atractivos turísticos de la zona en itinerarios programados en un periodo de tiempo específico (Rengifo, 2006).”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas, caminos históricos e itinerarios culturales
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Rengifo, 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Así, para ofertar globalmente los espacios locales, estos son transformados en productos que reúnen los atributos de excepcionalidad, pureza, autenticidad, historia o tradición (a veces todos juntos) que son del gusto del consumidor global.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Marketing territorial y proliferación de rutas culturales
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Otras rutas similares son aquellas que exaltan determinadas figuras históricas o personajes de ficción con el diseño de los itinerarios por los que transitaron o vivieron.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas, caminos históricos e itinerarios culturales
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 61
- It may state two separate claims as one. 52
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“En este sentido, los informes detallan un inventario de los escasos equipamientos turísticos existentes y resaltan los elementos más notables del patrimonio arqueológico y etnológico, que son caracterizados como atracciones turísticas complementarias del recurso más relevante: el patrimonio natural.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Con esta operación, y de acuerdo con los criterios exigidos por ICOMOS, el esfuerzo investigador trata de mostrar al Qhapaq Ñan como una red viaria generadora de continuos y fructíferos intercambios culturales entre pueblos que se manifiestan de modo sobresaliente en su patrimonio histórico tangible.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
hedgeddirect- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Entre los proyectos destacan cuatro trayectos: la Ruta Montero-Ayabaca-Aypate; el Corredor Turístico Loja-Ayabaca; el Proyecto Binacional de Turismo Rural en el Tramo Norte del Camino Inca (Loja-Aypate); y el Programa Integral Qhapaq Ñan.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“En los últimos años se han sucedido distintos diagnósticos y propuestas de rutas diseñados por organizaciones no gubernamentales (internacionales y nacionales) y consultoras, financiados por organismos públicos, que han trabajado con variados objetivos y orientaciones teórico-prácticas.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“El resultado es un informe que no se plantea probar la existencia de un territorio con características singulares que permitan construir una ruta temática”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Aunque la investigación etnográfica constituye una aportación relevante al conocimiento de aspectos significativos de la realidad cultural de las poblaciones contemporáneas, la ruta se articula en función de los restos arqueológicos y el trazado del Qhapaq Ñan.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Estos espacios son descritos como lugares donde pervive una naturaleza indómita, al tiempo que la cultura local y sus tradiciones son presentadas como manifestaciones atávicas de sociedades campesinas que se mantienen inmutables desde tiempos prehispánicos.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“El diagnóstico realizado sigue un modelo convencional de oferta y demanda que carece de una metodología basada en el trabajo de campo etnográfico, la investigación histórica y el análisis territorial para determinar los bienes patrimoniales y los recursos medioambientales y turísticos.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Rests on an assumption: La sierra de Ayabaca (Piura, Perú) contiene un patrimonio etnológico, ecológico y arqueológico muy rico.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“En este sentido, se subraya la importancia de una serie de espacios de notable valor ecológico, concretamente los bosques primarios nublados y los páramos, los cuales concentran numerosos manantiales y lagunas que aportan agua a las quebradas y valles de los ríos y constituyen el hábitat privilegiado de especies vegetales únicas o excepcionales (líquenes, musgos, helechos, bromelias, orquídeas y”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Por último, el Programa Integral Qhapaq Ñan es un ejemplo paradigmático de camino histórico, que presenta dos características que lo distinguen de las anteriores propuestas: en primer lugar, la metodología científica e inter-diciplinar empleada en su elaboración y, en segundo, su encuadre como uno de los ejes centrales de la política cultural de Perú que persigue con el proyecto lograr la declar”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Parten del supuesto Turismo = Desarrollo y de la premisa de que la transformación del recurso patrimonio cultural en producto asegura este desarrollo.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ambos diagnósticos trazan un recorrido que vincula dos regiones fronterizas mal comunicadas, pero marcadas históricamente por intercambios comerciales, sociales y culturales en un contexto de relativo aislamiento con respecto a los estados lógico.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“El recorrido propuesto se ajusta al modelo específico de ruta del patrimonio arqueológico y trata de explotar las ventajas derivadas de la inminente declaración del Camino Inca como Itinerario Cultural de la Humanidad.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Como se ha indicado, ninguno de estos cuatro proyectos se ha plasmado en una ruta efectiva.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Desde este enfoque el corredor se concibe como una ruta especifica del patrimonio natural centrada en la visita a enclaves de alto valor ecológico y escenarios donde presuntamente mora atrincherada la autenticidad.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Lo financia la Organización Mundial de Turismo con el apoyo técnico de las Universidades de Piura (Perú) y Loja (Ecuador), la Dirección Regional de Comercio Exterior y Turismo (DIRCETUR), la Casa de la Cultura de Ayabaca y dos organizaciones no gubernamentales: una internacional (Netherlands Development Organisation, SNV) y otra provincial (Escuela Campesina de Educación y Salud, ESCAES).”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Supone un amplio estudio multidisciplinar de todo el camino inca centrado sobre todo en acciones de identificación, conservación y valorización del patrimonio cultural existente para un ulterior desarrollo turístico.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“desde instancias políticas locales, regionales y nacionales se ha interpretado que el desarrollo turístico es una vía fundamental para la dinamización económica de la región y, dentro de esta estrategia, la creación de rutas el instrumento territorial más apropiado para alcanzar dicho objetivo.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“El diseño del corredor ha correspondido a dos entidades no gubernamentales contratadas por AECID: la Fundación para el Desarrollo Ecológico del Sur (EcoSur) de Loja (Ecuador) y la Asociación Proaves (Perú), cada una de las cuales ha elaborado un diagnóstico en su lado de la frontera.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“El Corredor Turístico Loja-Ayabaca es un itinerario promovido y financiado por la Agencia de Cooperación Internacional Española para el Desarrollo (AECID) en el marco del Proyecto Binacional de Ordenamiento, Manejo y Desarrollo de la Cuenca Catamayo-Chira que promueve el encuentro y el desarrollo transfronterizo entre Ecuador y Perú tras décadas de conflictos territoriales y bélicos.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“El Proyecto Binacional de Turismo Rural en el Tramo Norte del Camino Inca (Loja-Aypate) que discurre entre la frontera de Perú y Ecuador también se ha proyectado como futuro itinerario cultural transfronterizo.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“La Ruta Montero-Ayabaca-Aypate fue impulsada por el Gobierno de la Provincia Fronteriza de Ayabaca con el auxilio de la cooperación internacional española y dos organizaciones no gubernamentales que operan en la zona: Naturaleza y Cultura Internacional (NCI) e Instituto de Gestión de Cuencas Hidrográficas (IGCH).”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“El corredor turístico se concibe como un instrumento para impulsar y estrechar los lazos entre ambos estados y, paralelamente, como un medio idóneo para frenar la deforestación, la pérdida de biodiversidad de la selva ecuatorial andina y promover el ecoturismo.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Este concepto es el que guía un modelo de ruta específica, la cual resalta prioritariamente los valores naturales y, subordinados a estos, otras categorías patrimoniales que completan la oferta.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Dentro de esta lógica, los elementos patrimoniales seleccionados son contemplados únicamente como recursos turísticos mercantilizables sin considerar ni analizar los valores identitarios, históricos, etnológicos y ecológicos, ni la conexión existente entre ellos como un conjunto articulado.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“tan sólo se propone la construcción de un recorrido jalonado por bienes patrimoniales inconexos, cuyas características y estado de conservación no son determinados.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“En este concepto, los modos de vida, las costumbres y los rituales de la población autóctona constituyen atractivos subordinados al patrimonio arqueológico y son tratados con los mismos atributos de aislamiento y estatismo que los restos del pasado prehispánico.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Estas instituciones suscribieron un convenio de cooperación y contrataron a una consultora externa con sede en Lima para la elaboración de un diagnóstico sobre las potencialidades de la ruta.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“instrumento convencional no permite verificar con rigor la situación de partida y las potenciales ventajas competitivas de la ruta.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Los diagnósticos se han elaborado sin el apoyo de rigurosas investigaciones de campo (etnográficas, arqueológicas, geográficas e históricas) y apenas han contado con las valoraciones de los nativos.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Para alcanzar la nominación, el programa integra a los estados de Argentina, Chile, Perú, Ecuador y Bolivia por donde discurría el Qhapaq Ñan, aunque cada uno de ellos lleva a cabo las labores de investigación y conservación del patrimonio en su territorio.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Otros trazados obedecen a un diseño basado en leyendas y mitos -casi siempre adaptados muy libremente y con una buena dosis de elucubración histórica-que trata de inducir al turista a viajar por sitios particulares de los que se dice que poseen un encantamiento que trasciende.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas, caminos históricos e itinerarios culturales
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“De estos recorridos se suele destacar la presencia de restos prehistóricos (dólmenes, necrópolis, petroglifos…) y medievales (fortalezas, ermitas, iglesias…) junto con accidentes geológicos llamativos a los que se atribuyen propiedades curativas y/o mágicas (aguas, barros, plantas medicinales…), así como la celebración de rituales perdidos o vigentes pero presentados como atávicos.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas, caminos históricos e itinerarios culturales
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Ejemplos interesantes de esta tendencia serían las rutas literarias y cinematográficas que ponen en valor las localizaciones de filmes célebres, series televisivas y emplazamientos de novelas.Aquí el lugar es reinventado y se persigue estimular a los turistas a revivir con su particular mirada vicaria lo que antes leyeron en novelas o contemplaron en la pequeña o gran pantalla (Herbert, 2001;Hern”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas, caminos históricos e itinerarios culturales
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Herbert, 2001 source
- Not matchedcites Hernández, 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“El aumento de rutas se produce en un momento histórico de consolidación de una compleja industria transnacional y de un mercado global muy competitivo en el que participan diversos actores públicos y privados.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Marketing territorial y proliferación de rutas culturales
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Son rutas eclécticas en las que, siguiendo determinadas propuestas del marketing, el producto turístico se forma a partir de la suma de varios componentes, los cuales son prescindibles y sustituibles por otros.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas, caminos históricos e itinerarios culturales
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“El fenómeno supone la extensión del modelo de guía turística del ámbito urbano a espacios más amplios, contribuyendo a la expansión de la actividad a territorios anteriormente poco transitados o a la ampliación de un mercado preexistente.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Marketing territorial y proliferación de rutas culturales
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“y de otro, la expansión social del patrimonio que implica el surgimiento de nuevas categorías patrimoniales como las de paisaje e itinerario cultural.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Marketing territorial y proliferación de rutas culturales
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Un tercer tipo de rutas serían aquellas mixtas que se diferencian de las anteriores, de carácter monográfico, por carecer de un eje temático definido y por responder a una oferta territorial genérica.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas, caminos históricos e itinerarios culturales
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“De un lado, la creciente reflexividad social sobre la crisis del medio ambiente y de autenticidad de las culturas, que en el terreno de la práctica turística se manifiesta en un deseo cada vez más generalizado por conocer espacios naturales, sociedades singulares y bienes patrimoniales”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Marketing territorial y proliferación de rutas culturales
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Asimismo, con el objetivo de alcanzar una mayor proyección internacional, con frecuencia hacen suyos los avances conceptuales que en materia de patrimonio propagan instituciones de alto prestigio internacional como UNESCO y el Consejo de Europa, adaptando las rutas a los modelos sugeridos por estas instituciones supranacionales y por otros organismos nacionales y regionales.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Marketing territorial y proliferación de rutas culturales
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Los espacios que recorren estas rutas son mostrados como insólitos y cargados de leyendas que refieren a acontecimientos, personajes históricos e incluso fantásticos (templarios, duendes, magos, hadas, gigantes, fantasmas, brujas…) combinados a veces con interpretaciones esotéricas sobre las propiedades del lugar (Inglis y Holmes, 2003;Otamendi, 2008).”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas, caminos históricos e itinerarios culturales
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Inglis y Holmes, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Otamendi, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“En el primer caso se invita al visitante a recorrer un periplo en el que predomina una determinada categoría patrimonial, ya sean manifestaciones culturales, testimonios del pasado arqueológico o histórico, patrimonio artístico, industrial o espacios naturales.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas, caminos históricos e itinerarios culturales
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Para ello son construidas narrativas que reelaboran e incluso generan nuevas imágenes y significados de los lugares, subrayando determinados aspectos considerados sugestivos aun cuando puedan ser del todo ajenos a las poblaciones que habitan dichos entornos.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Marketing territorial y proliferación de rutas culturales
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Estos recorridos turísticos, que toman distintas denominaciones tales como corredores, rutas, circuitos, caminos o itinerarios, tratan de diferenciarse de sus competidores resaltando determinados recursos que están presentes en el territorio o que son imaginados y creados artificialmente.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas, caminos históricos e itinerarios culturales
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“En esta competencia territorial, las rutas turísticas constituyen un producto idóneo y recurrentemente utilizado para la promoción de espacios concretos.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Marketing territorial y proliferación de rutas culturales
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“La mayor parte de estas iniciativas son gestionadas por el sector privado sin la intervención directa de los poderes públicos ni los actores locales, por lo que su rentabilidad es externalizada y periférica.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas, caminos históricos e itinerarios culturales
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“En su diversidad de contenidos y dimensiones, todas tienen en común la proyección de un territorio para el consumo turístico a través de una vía, ya sea ésta terrestre, fluvial o marítima.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Marketing territorial y proliferación de rutas culturales
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“De acuerdo con esta lógica mercantil, las rutas son diseñadas artificialmente mediante la selección de una serie de hitos patrimoniales y recreativos que son asociados arbitrariamente bajo una etiqueta o lema común en la que se mezclan propuestas de visita y actividades heterogéneas.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas, caminos históricos e itinerarios culturales
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sin embargo, el modelo se ajusta más a la propuesta del Consejo de Europa por cuanto los objetivos manifiestos de la propuesta coinciden con los de esta institución pero aplicados a la realidad latinoamericana: fortalecer los lazos transfronterizos y generar un territorio para el consumo de productos turísticos que promueva el desarrollo, aunque dicha propuesta se apoye en débiles fundamentos”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Desde esta óptica el patrimonio cultural se interpreta como un instrumento para alcanzar estos fines y los itinerarios como un producto que los facilita.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas, caminos históricos e itinerarios culturales
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Esta resignificación del territorio y de su patrimonio arqueológico se ajusta a las expectativas de encuentro con la naturaleza, pureza y descubrimiento de lugares ignotos que tanto gusta a amplios sectores de turistas globales.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Estos académicos y profesionales certifican con su autoridad científica socialmente reconocida determinadas interpretaciones de la realidad, construyendo narrativas que reescriben la historia mediante una visión cargada de esencialismo, que remite a la continuidad del sentido histórico del camino, y generan nuevas imágenes y significados de los lugares ajenos a las poblaciones que los habitan.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > ISSN 1695-7121
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“En ellas se indica que, cuando se produce un control local del patrimonio, esto es, de sus significados y usos, se pueden generar nuevas relaciones entre la población y su patrimonio sin que esto suponga la trivialización de la cultura, así como promover dinámicas de desarrollo endógeno que permitan una reproducción social sostenible.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > ISSN 1695-7121
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“En todos ellos el interés del itinerario descansa en el pasado y, por tanto, lo que se subraya como la manifestación más relevante es el legado histórico tangible, que constituye su eje temático.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas, caminos históricos e itinerarios culturales
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sin embargo, en su diversidad, éstas tienden generalmente a la descontextualización del patrimonio, a la desarticulación de los territorios donde se enclavan y a la construcción de imágenes territoriales que no se corresponden plenamente con las realidades sociales y culturales de las sociedades donde se implantan.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Consideraciones finales
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“En todas ellas se parte de una instrumentalización del patrimonio al servicio del desarrollo turístico o como vía para la nominación e inscripción de itinerarios culturales en la lista del patrimonio mundial.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Consideraciones finales
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“El Consejo de Europa promueve la creación de vías que impulsen la conciencia e identidad europea, la cooperación internacional y fomenten el desarrollo económico, para lo que se creó en 1997 el Instituto Europeo de Itinerarios Culturales.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas, caminos históricos e itinerarios culturales
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Los caminos históricos constituyen una última categoría de rutas.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas, caminos históricos e itinerarios culturales
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Todas las rutas tratan de ajustarse a las demandas globales de autenticidad y singularidad de distintos sectores de turistas y a los segmentos de mercado que se imponen en el turismo cultural internacional.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > ISSN 1695-7121
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“mientras que el Consejo de Europa opta por una definición más abierta que incluya todo tipo de trazados que contribuyan al acercamiento y la cooperación entre pueblos (especialmente localizados en estados distintos), difundan la cultura, memoria e identidad europea y promuevan el desarrollo turístico (Consejo de Europa, 1998).”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas, caminos históricos e itinerarios culturales
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Consejo de Europa, 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Por ello, en su diseño se promociona un tipo de bienes de acuerdo con los criterios de la UNESCO o con la concepción global de naturaleza y autenticidad que deben acreditar los destinos turísticos para competir con ventaja en el mercado turístico.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Consideraciones finales
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Con la ruta genérica no se asegura la protección del patrimonio y sí su transformación en mercancía, lo que podría suponer la banalización de sus significados y un distanciamiento de las poblaciones con respecto a su legado cultural.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“El establecimiento de las directrices que deben definir a los itinerarios culturales en contraposición a las rutas turísticas ha abierto un interesante debate sobre esta nueva categoría patrimonial.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas, caminos históricos e itinerarios culturales
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Este objetivo se convierte en algunos casos en el que motiva la propia creación del producto, como es el caso de la Ruta Don Quijote que fue diseñada ex profeso en 2004 para formar parte de la Red de Itinerarios Culturales Europeos (Campos, 2006) en la que se integra desde 2007.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas, caminos históricos e itinerarios culturales
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Campos, 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Como alternativa propone fomentar el reconocimiento de itinerarios culturales que pongan en valor caminos en los que históricamente haya existido “una dinámica habitual de recorridos con un carácter funcional, es decir, conexiones históricas destacables y permanentes a través de un itinerario comúnmente practicado (Suárez-Inclán, 2004).”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas, caminos históricos e itinerarios culturales
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Suárez-Inclán, 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“El énfasis en la naturaleza virgen y en la cultura intacta genera una imagen idealizada del territorio que es mostrado como un reducto, subrayando atributos considerados muy sugestivos por los turistas globales, pero que no se corresponden con la realidad histórica y cultural de un territorio que ha sido modelado y transformado por el hombre a lo largo de la historia.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“ICOMOS distingue dos tipos de itinerarios culturales: en primer lugar, las rutas históricas trazadas para dar curso a un propósito determinado, como por ejemplo, el Qhapaq Ñan o Camino Inca y las calzadas del Imperio Romano; y en segundo, aquellas que son resul-tado de largos procesos evolutivos en los que intervienen distintos factores humanos que coinciden y se encauzan a un mismo fin, como por”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas, caminos históricos e itinerarios culturales
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites ICOMOS, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“El diseño del itinerario responde a una estrategia de desarrollo económico territorial a partir del turismo sin base científica, por lo que la selección del territorio se justifica simplemente por la pertenencia de las poblaciones por las que discurre el camino a la provincia de Ayabaca (Piura) y la frágil situación económica de sus habitantes.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Esto es más evidente cuando el producto se integra en inventarios internacionales como el del Consejo de Europa y más claramente en la Lista del Patrimonio Mundial sobre todo tras el reconocimiento por parte de la UNESCO, en 2005, de las Rutas Patrimoniales (o itinerarios Culturales) como categoría específica.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas, caminos históricos e itinerarios culturales
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Aunque en los diagnósticos abundan las referencias al desarrollo sostenible y a la participación de la población local, ésta no interviene en la investigación y definición de los recursos culturales, no se plantean modelos de gestión comunitaria del patrimonio y todo apunta a que se espera la atracción de capital externo para la construcción de infraestructuras, la dotación de servicios turísticos”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > ISSN 1695-7121
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“De este modo, la realidad histórica y antropológica se ajusta con calzador al concepto, produciendo mitos postmodernos que pueden ser posteriormente instrumentalizados por la ingeniería turística que produce rutas culturales.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > ISSN 1695-7121
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Este fenómeno se produce en un marco de competencia territorial global donde los gestores de las rutas se afanan por dar a conocer su producto en el mercado turístico internacional.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas, caminos históricos e itinerarios culturales
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Estos trayectos son promovidos generalmente por organismos públicos con el objetivo del reconocimiento institucional de los mismos como itinerarios culturales a través de su inscripción en catálogos oficiales de bienes culturales.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas, caminos históricos e itinerarios culturales
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Para cumplir tales requerimientos, los candidatos se esfuerzan por argumentar el carácter cultural de sus propuestas, tratando de ajustar su oferta a los criterios de los organismos internacionales.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas, caminos históricos e itinerarios culturales
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Y en este propósito de mercantilización de la cultura para la seducción de turistas, el legado tangible del pasado funciona como el principal atractivo, especialmente el complejo arqueológico de Aypate, -una ciudad inca bastante desconocida, pero de un gran interés arqueológico y patrimonial.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Salvando las distancias, el fenómeno es similar al que se produce con las candidaturas de ciudades para la celebración de Olimpiadas; en ambos casos lo que subyace en todo este proceso es el objetivo de posicionamiento estratégico en el mercado turístico global y la pugna por atraer a los territorios turistas, capitales e inversores.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas, caminos históricos e itinerarios culturales
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“ICOMOS propone una noción que se apoye en hechos históricos reales haciendo referencia a vías que hayan favorecido la inter-fecundación de culturas en el espacio y el tiempo (Capel, 2005); mientras que el Consejo de Europa opta por una definición más abierta que incluya todo tipo de trazados que contribuyan al acercamiento y la cooperación entre pueblos (especialmente localizados en estados”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas, caminos históricos e itinerarios culturales
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Capel, 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cada uno de estos proyectos responde, como veremos, a distintas concepciones patrimoniales y a tipologías de rutas indicados anteriormente: el primero se ajusta al modelo mixto o genérico; el segundo al de corredor del patrimonio natural; el tercero al específico de patrimonio arqueológico, y el último al de camino histórico.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sin embargo, en la propuesta se verifica la rigidez de los criterios propuestos por ICOMOS.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A pesar de esta variedad de propuestas, de escalas territoriales y de actividades posibles, el procedimiento de transformación de un espacio en territorio turístico es siempre similar.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > ISSN 1695-7121
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“ICOMOS critica esta definición por falta de rigor científico y no acepta que los itinerarios culturales respondan a propuestas artificiales en las que prevalezca “la imaginación y la voluntad de establecer conjuntos asociativos de bienes culturales que posean rasgos comunes” que vinculan, por meros motivos de oportunidad político-culturalmercantil, a tres o cuatro puntos geográficos próximos entre”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas, caminos históricos e itinerarios culturales
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites ICOMOS, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Asimismo, los cuatro tipos coinciden en ofertar una serie de hitos patrimoniales con grandes vacíos en el entorno de la vía, lo que implica la promoción de las zonas por donde discurre la ruta en detrimento de las adyacentes.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“es la comunidad, como instancia organizativa básica, la que puede y debe protagonizar el desarrollo turístico, impidiendo la pérdida de control económico en su territorio, así como la banalización de su identidad y de su patrimonio cultural.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > ISSN 1695-7121
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Ruiz, et al., 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“La consecuencia probable de este modelo de desarrollo turístico es la fragmentación del territorio, la generación de desequilibrios económicos territoriales y la promoción de una determinada tipología de patrimonio, ignorando o minusvalorando otras categorías.”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > Rutas turísticas y caminos históricos en los Andes septentrionales del Perú
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Tal como indica Nogués (2006) para el caso de la comarca de la Bonaigua (Alicante), suele ocurrir que, cuando estas operaciones son avaladas o lideradas por las administraciones, el escenario turístico y los atributos seleccionados son transformados en nuevos marcadores de la identidad territorial, lo cual no deja de ser una paradoja, pues éstos son diseñados según criterios globales de autenticid”
§ Los caminos del patrimonio. Rutas turísticas e itinerarios culturales > ISSN 1695-7121
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Nogués, 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper relies on this without support.
La sierra de Ayabaca (Piura, Perú) contiene un patrimonio etnológico, ecológico y arqueológico muy rico.
“Una muestra de que el fenómeno de las rutas turísticas alcanza una dimensión planetaria es el caso de la sierra de Ayabaca (Piura, Perú): un territorio de frontera y periférico situado en una de las áreas más pobres y deprimidas del país andino que, sin embargo, contiene un riquísimo patrimonio etnológico, ecológico y arqueo-”
The paper relies on this without support.
El número de vías reconocidas internacionalmente como itinerarios culturales ha crecido continuamente desde 1987/1993.
“Desde entonces el número de vías reconocidas internacionalmente no ha parado de crecer, lo que ha motivado a muchas administraciones promotoras de rutas turísticas a postularse como candidatas para la anotación de sus propuestas en los catálogos de estas instituciones supranacionales.”
The paper relies on this without support.
El Camino de Santiago fue inscrito por el Consejo de Europa en 1987 como primer Itinerario Cultural Europeo y registrado por la UNESCO en 1993 como Patrimonio de la Humanidad.
“En 1987 el Consejo de Europa inscribió el Camino de Santiago como el primer Itinerario Cultural Europeo y en 1993 esta misma ruta fue registrada por la UNESCO como Patrimonio de la Humanidad.”
Citations
Cites
Briedenhann, J., & Wickens, E. (2003) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/s0261-5177(03)00063-3 · Cited by 941
Consecuencias de la modernidad
Giddens, A. (2018) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 921
Literary places, tourism and the heritage experience
Herbert, D. (2001) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/s0160-7383(00)00048-7 · Cited by 288
Turismo comunitario en Ecuador.: Comprendiendo el community-based tourism desde la comunidad
Ballesteros, E. R., Ramírez, M. H., Pérez, A. C., Cantero, P. A., & Tejedor, A. D. C. (2008) · PASOS Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural · doi:10.25145/j.pasos.2008.06.031 · Cited by 142
The long and winding roads: Perceived quality of scenic tourism routes
Denstadli, J. M., & Jacobsen, J. K. S. (2011) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2010.06.014 · Cited by 108
Suárez-Inclán, M. R. (2005) · Hereditas · Cited by 16
Textiles, Memory and the Souvenir Industry in the Andes
de Vidas, A. A. (1995) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446250402.n4 · Cited by 14
Rutas culturales y turismo en el contexto español
Gallego, J. I. R. (2006) · PH. Boletín del Instituto Andaluza del Patrimonio Histórico/PH/PH. Boletín del Instituto Andaluz del Patrimonio Histórico/Boletín informativo - Instituto Andaluz del Patrimonio Histórico · doi:10.33349/2006.60.2263 · Cited by 11
Ruralismo y tecnotropismo: turismo y desarrollo en la Bonaigua
Pedregal, A. M. N. (2006) · PASOS Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural · doi:10.25145/j.pasos.2006.04.004 · Cited by 7
Ciudades abaluartadas de la raya ibérica: de frontera a paisaje cultural
Fernández, A.-J. C., Príncipe, A. D., & Bucho, D. (2006) · revista PH · doi:10.33349/2006.60.2258
Ruta de Don Quijote. Un personaje literario... un producto turístico
Romero, M. L. C. (2006) · revista PH · doi:10.33349/2006.60.2264
Globalización y Turismo: Impactos en los Territorios
Filardo, V. (2006) · PAMPA · doi:10.14409/pampa.v1i2.3136
Inglis, D., & Holmes, M. (2003) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/s0160-7383(02)00031-2
La creación de productos turísticos utilizando rutas enológicas
Guzmán, T. J. L.-G., & Cañizares, S. M. S. (2008) · PASOS Revista de turismo y patrimonio cultural · doi:10.25145/j.pasos.2008.06.013
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Aguilar, Encarnación, Dolores Merino y Mercedes Mi- gens 2003 "Cultura, políticas de desarrollo y turismo rural en el ámbito de la globalización.". Horizontes Antropo- lógicos, 9 (20): 161-183.
- García de Miguel, J. M. 2002 "Itinerarios culturales relacionados con el patri- monio histórico minero". En AA.VV. El patrimonio intangible y otros aspectos relativos a los itinerarios culturales (pp. 145-157). Pamplona: Gobierno de Na- varra.
- Hernández, Javier 2005 "Cine, Turismo y Cultura". En Cao, M. V., J. Her- nández, R. Plasencia y M. Salinas (Coord.) El cine visto por los antropólogos (pp. 9-29). Lima: Univer- sidad Nacional de San Marcos. 2005 "Activando la memoria, mirando al futuro. Patri- monialización de un oficio perdido y dinamización turística". En Pascual, José y David Florido ¿Prote- giendo los recursos? Áreas protegidas, poblaciones locales y sostenibilidad (pp. 173-186). Sevilla: ASA- NA. FAAEE.
- Kroshus, Laurie 2003 "La comercialización cultural. El turismo y la identidad maya". Annals of Tourism Research en Es- pañol, 5 (1): 86-103.
- Lagunas, David 2006 "El espacio del turismo". Alteridades, 16 (31): 119- 129.
- Mitchell, Ross y Donald Reid 2001 "Integración comunitaria. Turismo insular en Perú". Annals of Tourism Research en Español, 3 (1): 144-172.
- Otamendi, Alejandro 2008 "El turismo místico-esotérico". RBTur Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo, 2 (2): 20-40.
- Palti, Elías 2001 "Introducción". En Koselleck, Reinhart Los estra- tos del tiempo: estudios sobre la historia (pp. 9-42). Barcelona: Paidós.
- Tondre, Francoise 2007 "El Patrimonio Cultural y los Itinerarios Cultu- rales del Consejo de Europa: nuevas orientaciones, caminos hacia la diversidad, puentes entre las comu- nidades". En AA.VV Caminos de Sefarad. Memoria 2007 (pp. 28-34). Jaén: Red de juderías de España.
- Tucker, Huzel 2001 "Turistas y trogloditas. Negociando la sostenibili- Los caminos del patrimonio ... ISSN 1695-7121 dad". Annals of Toursim Research en Español, 3 (2): 259-286.
- Zamora, Elías y Rafael Merinero 2003 "Patrimonio Cultural, turismo y desarrollo endó- geno. El caso de la "ruta del Tempranillo". En An- tonio. M. Nogués (Coord.), Cultura y turismo (pp. 83-109). Sevilla: Signatura Ediciones.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
El patrimonio cultural en los servicios turísticos en la provincia De Manabí, Ecuador.
(Ecuador), U. L. “. A. D. M., Muñoz, D. G. H., Rodríguez, R. M. T., & (Ecuador), U. L. “. A. D. M. (2020) · PASOS Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural · doi:10.25145/j.pasos.2020.18.027 · Cited by 29
Martín, J. M. S., Gascón, J. L. G., & García-Berzosa, M. J. (2020) · ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information · doi:10.3390/ijgi9040200 · Cited by 29
Montoya, A. V. G., Parra, J. F. E., Velásquez, C. R. C., Guanuche, P. E. T., Vintimilla, G. M. P., Mestanza-Ramón, C., & Vizuete, D. D. C. (2021) · Land · doi:10.3390/land10080884 · Cited by 29
Carbone, F., Corinto, G. L., & Malek, A. (2016) · AIMS Geosciences · doi:10.3934/geosci.2016.2.152 · Cited by 26
Sánchez, M. L., & del Pulgar, M. L. G. (2021) · IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/1165/1/012006 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- (España), U. D. S., & Hernández Ramírez, J.
- Venue
- PASOS. Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural
- Publisher
- University of La Laguna
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 225-236
- ISSN
- 1695-7121 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1512825724
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 11.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- es
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- PASOS Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Scientia Insularum Revista de Ciencias Naturales en islas (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Urbanism, Landscape, and Tourism Studies
- Keywords
- heritage tourism, tourism routes, cultural routes, heritage routes, Piura, heritage typology, ICOMOS, Council of Europe, local development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
