Generative AI in education: To embrace it or not？
Open accessAbstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has gained immense popularity, but it has also brought forth new challenges and concerns in academia. One major worry is AI-assisted cheating, where students use Generative AI to complete assignments and exams, leading to some U.S. schools banning its usage on campus. However, the developers of ChatGPT, OpenAI, assured the public that they never intended ChatGPT to be used deceitfully in schools or elsewhere. They are already working on mitigations to make it easier for anyone to recognize text produced by that system. Open AI went ahead to state that they were looking forward to working with educators on practical solutions, and other ways to help teachers and students benefit from AI. DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20231603.8486 Citation: Okaiyeto S A, Bai J W, Xiao H W. Generative AI in education: To embrace it or not? Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2023; 16(3): 285–286.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GenAIs have permanently impacted education and will continue to do so.
“As universities understand the various uses and ways to integrate GenAIs into curriculum and how best they would serve student learning and course development, it is also important to remember GenAIs have permanently impacted education and will continue to do so [7].”
From Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Evidence from an analysis of institutional policies and guidelines (2025) · cites this paper as [7]
The paper’s Abstract urges universities to adapt curricula and prepare students for a future in which AI plays an integral role, supporting the expectation of continued impact. It does not establish that generative AI has permanently changed education; it cautions that the early impact of new technologies can be overestimated. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence
Noy, S., & Zhang, W. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adh2586 · Cited by 2,150 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Key words: Generative AI, education, ChatGPT, OpenAI DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20231603.8486 Citation: Okaiyeto S A, Bai J W, Xiao H W. Generative AI in education: To embrace it or not? Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2023; 16(3): 285-286.
- Jungwirth D, Haluza D. Artificial Intelligence and the Sustainable Development Goals: An Exploratory Study in the Context of the Society Domain Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 2023; 16(4): 91-112. doi: 10.4236/jsea.2023.164006. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McDonald, N., Johri, A., Ali, A., & Collier, A. H. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100121 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Ahmed, Z., Shanto, S. S., Rime, M. H. K., Morol, M. K., Fahad, N., Hossen, M. J., & Abdullah-Al-Jubair, M. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3461874 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
“However, critical ethical, legal, and social risks are inherent in deploying generative models in education [5].”
BackgroundIrish, A. L., Gazica, M. W., & Becerra, V. (2025) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-025-00435-4 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Impact of generative AI on educational sector
., & Singh, A. K. (2024) · INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT · doi:10.55041/ijsrem30724 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Guoan, Z., Mengting, P., & Shaobo, W. (2025) · 2025 14th International Conference on Educational and Information Technology (ICEIT) · doi:10.1109/iceit64364.2025.10975838 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ariyo Okaiyeto, S., College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Q. A. U., Bai, J., & Xiao, H.
- Affiliations
- Jiangsu University (CN)
- ORCID
- Bai, Junwen
- Venue
- International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering
- Published
- 2023
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 285-286
- ISSN
- 1934-6344 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4386608988
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 10.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- International journal of agricultural and biological engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- generative AI, artificial intelligence in education, academic dishonesty, ChatGPT, AI detection, academic integrity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
