Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 675

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparison of 3-Dimensional Scapular Position and Orientation Between Subjects With and Without Shoulder Impingement

Lukasiewicz, Amy Cole, McClure, Philip, Michener, Lori, Pratt, Neal, Sennett, Brian, Ludewig, Paula, Lukasiewicz, Amy Cole, McClure, Philip, Michener, Lori, Pratt, Neal, Sennett, Brian·1999·Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Nonrandomized 2 group post-test only. OBJECTIVE: To compare scapular position and orientation between subjects with and without impingement syndrome. BACKGROUND: Abnormal scapular motion is commonly believed to be a contributing factor to shoulder impingement syndrome. METHODS AND MEASURES: Twenty nonimpaired subjects with a mean age of 34.3 (+/- 7.5 years) and 17 patients with impingement syndrome with a mean age of 45.8 (+/- 11.0) participated. A 3-dimensional electromechanical digitizer was used to measure scapular position and orientation in 3 planes. Measurements were taken with the arm at the side, elevated in the scapular plane to horizontal, and at maximum elevation. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare nonimpaired subjects to the impingement group and the symptomatic and asymptomatic sides within the impingement group. Five scapular kinematic variables were assessed at each arm position. Orientation was described by posterior tilting angle, upward rotation angle, and internal rotation angle. Position was described by medial-lateral position and superior-inferior position and determined by the distance from the scapula centroid to the seventh cervical vertebra (C7). RESULTS: During scapular plane elevation of the arm, the scapula showed a general pattern of increasing posterior-tilt angle, increasing upward-rotation angle, and decreasing internal-rotation angle in both impingement and nonimpaired groups. Also, the scapula moved to a more superior position and a slightly more medial position with increasing arm elevation. Compared to nonimpaired subjects (34.6 degrees +/- 9.7), those with impingement demonstrated a significantly lower posterior tilting angle of the scapula in the sagittal plane (25.1 degrees +/- 9.1). Subjects with impingement also demonstrated higher superior-inferior scapular position with maximal arm elevation (5.2 cm +/- 1.6 below the first thoracic vertebrae) compared to nonimpaired subjects (7.5 cm +/- 1.5). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that altered scapular kinematics may be an important aspect of the impingement syndrome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2519/jospt.1999.29.10.574

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 675

Metadata

Authors
Lukasiewicz, A. C., McClure, P., Michener, L., Pratt, N., Sennett, B., Ludewig, P., Lukasiewicz, A. C., McClure, P., Michener, L., Pratt, N., & Sennett, B.
Venue
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
Published
1999-10
Volume
29
Issue
10
Pages
574-586
ISSN
  • 0190-6011 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-1344
OpenAlex
W1996591961
Cited by
675
References
0
FWCI
7.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of 3-Dimensional Scapular Position and Orientation Between Subjects With and Without Shoulder Impingement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2519/jospt.1999.29.10.574
The paper
Lukasiewicz, A. C., McClure, P., Michener, L., Pratt, N., Sennett, B., Ludewig, P., Lukasiewicz, A. C., McClure, P., Michener, L., Pratt, N., & Sennett, B. (1999). Comparison of 3-Dimensional Scapular Position and Orientation Between Subjects With and Without Shoulder Impingement. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1999.29.10.574

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.