Cited by 128Muscle Physiology and DisordersExercise and Physiological ResponsesMuscle and Compartmental Disorders

What mechanisms contribute to the strength loss that occurs during and in the recovery from skeletal muscle injury?

Warren, Gordon L., Ingalls, Christopher P., Lowe, Dawn A., Armstrong, R. B.·2002·Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy

Abstract

In the workplace or on the athletic field, muscle strength can be decreased by 50% or more following performance of a relatively few high-force, eccentric contractions. The strength loss can be prolonged, taking a month or more for complete recovery. It is important to understand the cause(s) of the strength loss so we can develop means of preventing or attenuating this loss. The cellular-level mechanisms explaining the loss of strength following contraction-induced muscle injury remain controversial. The traditional thought is that initial strength loss is due solely to damage to force-bearing structures within the muscle, as evidenced by histopathology. In addition, inflammation in the days following injury is commonly thought to exacerbate the strength loss. We present data to the contrary. Recent data show that most of the early strength loss results from a failure of excitation-contraction coupling processes and that a slow loss of contractile protein in the days following injury prolongs the time for recovery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2519/jospt.2002.32.2.58

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 128

Authors
Warren, G. L., Ingalls, C. P., Lowe, D. A., & Armstrong, R. B.
Affiliations
Georgia State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
Published
2002-02
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
58-64
ISSN
  • 0190-6011 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-1344
OpenAlex
W1987054300
Cited by
128
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (F32AG005815)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Muscle and Compartmental Disorders
Keywords
skeletal muscle injury, strength degradation, eccentric contraction, excitation-contraction coupling, muscle recovery, inflammation, muscle damage, histopathology
MeSH terms
Physical Exertion, Humans, Muscle Contraction, Muscle Proteins, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Fibers, Skeletal, Recovery of Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review