Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 15Lignin and Wood ChemistryWood Treatment and PropertiesMaterial Properties and Processing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Soluble Anthraquinone Application on Prehydrolysis Soda Cooking of Acacia crassicarpa Wood

Open access
Utami, Syelvia Putri, Tanifuji, Keishi, Putra, Agusta Samodra, Nakagawa-Izumi, Akiko, Ohi, Hiroshi, Evelyn, Evelyn·2021·JAPAN TAPPI JOURNAL

Abstract

Acacia crassicarpa has a potential source as a renewable forest material in Indonesia. This research clarified the conditions to produce dissolving pulp with suitable properties from A. crassicarpa wood by prehydrolysis at 150℃ for 3 h and soda cooking at 160℃ for 3 h with application of 0.1% soluble anthraquinone (SAQ:1,4-dihydro-9,10-dihydroxyanthracene sodium salt). The presence of SAQ in soda cooking exhibited a significant increase in pulp yield (1.8%) compared to kraft cooking at a given kappa number (approximately 11). The bleaching ability of the soda-SAQ pulp in elemental chlorine-free process with peroxymonosulfuric acid (O-D0/Psa-Ep-D1 sequence) was sufficiently good for dissolving pulp properties. The α-cellulose content, brightness, viscosity and ash content were 94.1%, 88.1% ISO, 10.3 mPa·s, and 0.02%, respectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2524/jtappij.75.373

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 21) Tomani P:The lignoboost process. Cellulose Chemistry Technol. 44 (1-3):53-58, 2010

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Utami, S. P., Tanifuji, K., Putra, A. S., Nakagawa-Izumi, A., Ohi, H., & Evelyn, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Tsukuba (JP)
  • Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba
  • Riau University (ID)
Venue
JAPAN TAPPI JOURNAL
Published
2021
Volume
75
Issue
4
Pages
373-379
ISSN
  • 0022-815X (ISSN-L)
  • 1881-1000
OpenAlex
W3175788780
Cited by
13
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
JAPAN TAPPI JOURNAL (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Lignin and Wood Chemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Wood Treatment and Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Material Properties and Processing
Keywords
Acacia crassicarpa, prehydrolysis, soda cooking, dissolving pulp, pulp yield, elemental chlorine-free bleaching, peroxymonosulfuric acid, alpha-cellulose, pulp brightness, pulp viscosity, ash content, kappa number

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.